[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/ixgbe: fix mailbox interrupt handler

Dai, Wei wei.dai at intel.com
Fri Jan 12 03:29:33 CET 2018


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:08 PM
> To: Dai, Wei <wei.dai at intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Liang-min <liang-min.wang at intel.com>;
> stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] net/ixgbe: fix mailbox interrupt handler
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dai, Wei
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 12:39 PM
> > To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo
> > <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Liang-min <liang-min.wang at intel.com>;
> > stable at dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] net/ixgbe: fix mailbox interrupt handler
> >
> > According to step 7 & 8 in Table 7-74 PF-to-VF Messaging Flow in 82599
> > datasheet, The calling of ixgbe_read_mbx( ) can be replaced by
> > following lines to avoid touching ->mbx.v2p_mailbox,
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFMAILBOX, IXGBE_VFMAILBOX_ACK);
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> 
> I think the patch try to keep things unchanged when a PF reset happen, but it
> is not going to cover the case that PF reset interrupt and a foreground VF to
> PF request happen simultaneously which is an knowing issue Your suggestion
> may help on that, but it is not a complete fix. I think it will be better to have
> a separate patch that focus on it.
Agree with you.
> 
> Regards
> Qi
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zhang, Qi Z
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:22 AM
> > > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
> > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Dai, Wei <wei.dai at intel.com>; Wang, Liang-min
> > > <liang-min.wang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>;
> > > stable at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net/ixgbe: fix mailbox interrupt handler
> > >
> > > Mailbox interrupt handler only take care of PF reset notification,
> > > for other message ixgbe_read_mbx should not be called since it get
> > > chance to break the foreground VF to PF communication.
> > > This can be simply repeated by
> > > testpmd>rx_vlan rm all 0
> > >
> > > Fixes: 77234603fba0 ("net/ixgbe: support VF mailbox interrupt for
> > > link
> > > up/down")
> > > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai at intel.com>

> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 10 +++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > index ff19a56..02121f4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -8165,13 +8165,17 @@ static void ixgbevf_mbx_process(struct
> > > rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > >  	struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
> > > IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > >  	u32 in_msg = 0;
> > >
> > > -	if (ixgbe_read_mbx(hw, &in_msg, 1, 0))
> > > -		return;
> > > +	/* peek the message first */
> > > +	in_msg = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFMBMEM);
> > >
> > >  	/* PF reset VF event */
> > > -	if (in_msg == IXGBE_PF_CONTROL_MSG)
> > > +	if (in_msg == IXGBE_PF_CONTROL_MSG) {
> > > +		/* dummy mbx read to ack pf */
> > > +		if (ixgbe_read_mbx(hw, &in_msg, 1, 0))
> > > +			return;
> > >  		_rte_eth_dev_callback_process(dev,
> > > RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET,
> > >  					      NULL, NULL);
> > > +	}
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static int
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4



More information about the dev mailing list