[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/ixgbevf: add check for rte_intr_enable.

Dai, Wei wei.dai at intel.com
Fri Jan 12 13:10:22 CET 2018


Hi, Tonghao
Thanks for your patch.
It looks that same change can be applied to ixgbe_dev_interrupt_action( )
and ixgbe_dev_interrupt_delayed_handler( ).
Anyway, you can test all these changes with example/l3fwd-power. 
-Wei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 3:06 PM
> To: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/ixgbevf: add check for
> rte_intr_enable.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tonghao Zhang
> > Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 10:11 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/ixgbevf: add check for
> rte_intr_enable.
> 
> The patch is not only for ixgbevf, but also for ixgbe, right?
> so how about changing the title with net/ixgbe started?
> 
> > When we bind the ixgbevf to vfio and call the
> > rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_enable and rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_disable frequently,
> > the interrupt setting
> > (msi_set_mask_bit) will take more CPU as show below. rte_intr_enable
> > call the ioctl to map the fd to interrupts frequently.
> >
> > perf top:
> > 5.45%  [kernel]   [k] msi_set_mask_bit
> >
> > It is unnecessary to call the rte_intr_enable in
> > ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_intr_enable. because the fds has been mapped to
> > interrupt and not unmapped in ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_intr_disable.
> >
> > This patch add checks for using VFIO.  With the patch,
> > msi_set_mask_bit is not listed in perl any more. Any suggestion will be
> welcome.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index e929235..79e4097 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -5610,7 +5610,9 @@ static void ixgbevf_set_vfta_all(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev, bool on)
> >  	RTE_SET_USED(queue_id);
> >  	IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VTEIMS, intr->mask);
> >
> > -	rte_intr_enable(intr_handle);
> > +	if (intr_handle->type == RTE_INTR_HANDLE_UIO ||
> > +	    intr_handle->type == RTE_INTR_HANDLE_UIO_INTX)
> > +		rte_intr_enable(intr_handle);
> 
> For igb_uio, did you check if it's necessary to call rte_intr_enable every time?
> Since rte interrupt is not disabled during ixgbevf_dev_rx_queue_intr_disable.
> 
> >
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -5659,7 +5661,10 @@ static void ixgbevf_set_vfta_all(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev, bool on)
> >  		mask &= (1 << (queue_id - 32));
> >  		IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_EIMS_EX(1), mask);
> >  	}
> > -	rte_intr_enable(intr_handle);
> > +
> > +	if (intr_handle->type == RTE_INTR_HANDLE_UIO ||
> > +	    intr_handle->type == RTE_INTR_HANDLE_UIO_INTX)
> > +		rte_intr_enable(intr_handle);
> 
> The same comment as above.
> 
> >
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1



More information about the dev mailing list