[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] test: fix memory leak in ring autotest
Burakov, Anatoly
anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Wed Jan 17 09:42:55 CET 2018
On 17-Jan-18 8:36 AM, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> Get rid of global static ring variable and don't reuse rings
> between test runs.
>
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
> ---
> test/test/test_ring.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/test/test_ring.c b/test/test/test_ring.c
> index 19d497a..b339f04 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_ring.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_ring.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@
>
> static rte_atomic32_t synchro;
>
> -static struct rte_ring *r;
> -
> #define TEST_RING_VERIFY(exp) \
> if (!(exp)) { \
> printf("error at %s:%d\tcondition " #exp " failed\n", \
> @@ -73,7 +71,7 @@ static struct rte_ring *r;
> * helper routine for test_ring_basic
> */
> static int
> -test_ring_basic_full_empty(void * const src[], void *dst[])
> +test_ring_basic_full_empty(struct rte_ring *r, void * const src[], void *dst[])
> {
> unsigned i, rand;
> const unsigned rsz = RING_SIZE - 1;
> @@ -114,7 +112,7 @@ test_ring_basic_full_empty(void * const src[], void *dst[])
> }
>
> static int
> -test_ring_basic(void)
> +test_ring_basic(struct rte_ring *r)
> {
> void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
> int ret;
> @@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ test_ring_basic(void)
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - if (test_ring_basic_full_empty(src, dst) != 0)
> + if (test_ring_basic_full_empty(r, src, dst) != 0)
> goto fail;
>
> cur_src = src;
> @@ -317,7 +315,7 @@ test_ring_basic(void)
> }
>
> static int
> -test_ring_burst_basic(void)
> +test_ring_burst_basic(struct rte_ring *r)
> {
> void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
> int ret;
> @@ -731,6 +729,7 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
>
> ret = 0;
> fail_test:
> + rte_ring_free(rp);
> if (obj != NULL)
> rte_free(obj);
>
> @@ -811,61 +810,67 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
> static int
> test_ring(void)
> {
> + struct rte_ring *r = NULL;
> +
> /* some more basic operations */
> if (test_ring_basic_ex() < 0)
> - return -1;
> + goto test_fail;
>
> rte_atomic32_init(&synchro);
>
> + r = rte_ring_create("test", RING_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> if (r == NULL)
> - r = rte_ring_create("test", RING_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> - if (r == NULL)
> - return -1;
> + goto test_fail;
>
> /* retrieve the ring from its name */
> if (rte_ring_lookup("test") != r) {
> printf("Cannot lookup ring from its name\n");
> - return -1;
> + goto test_fail;
> }
>
> /* burst operations */
> - if (test_ring_burst_basic() < 0)
> - return -1;
> + if (test_ring_burst_basic(r) < 0)
> + goto test_fail;
>
> /* basic operations */
> - if (test_ring_basic() < 0)
> - return -1;
> + if (test_ring_basic(r) < 0)
> + goto test_fail;
>
> /* basic operations */
> if ( test_create_count_odd() < 0){
> - printf ("Test failed to detect odd count\n");
> - return -1;
> - }
> - else
> - printf ( "Test detected odd count\n");
> + printf("Test failed to detect odd count\n");
> + goto test_fail;
> + } else
> + printf("Test detected odd count\n");
>
> if ( test_lookup_null() < 0){
> - printf ("Test failed to detect NULL ring lookup\n");
> - return -1;
> - }
> - else
> - printf ( "Test detected NULL ring lookup \n");
> + printf("Test failed to detect NULL ring lookup\n");
> + goto test_fail;
> + } else
> + printf("Test detected NULL ring lookup\n");
>
> /* test of creating ring with wrong size */
> if (test_ring_creation_with_wrong_size() < 0)
> - return -1;
> + goto test_fail;
>
> /* test of creation ring with an used name */
> if (test_ring_creation_with_an_used_name() < 0)
> - return -1;
> + goto test_fail;
>
> if (test_ring_with_exact_size() < 0)
> - return -1;
> + goto test_fail;
>
> /* dump the ring status */
> rte_ring_list_dump(stdout);
>
> + rte_ring_free(r);
> +
> return 0;
> +
> +test_fail:
> + rte_ring_free(r);
> +
> + return -1;
> }
>
> REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(ring_autotest, test_ring);
>
Apologies, for some reason the old and incorrect commit message was
attached. I'll respin it.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list