[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/null: Support bulk alloc and free.

Ananyev, Konstantin konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
Mon Mar 5 16:36:08 CET 2018



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
> Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 3:25 PM
> To: Koujalagi, MalleshX <malleshx.koujalagi at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: mtetsuyah at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/null: Support bulk alloc and free.
> 
> On 2/3/2018 3:11 AM, Mallesh Koujalagi wrote:
> > After bulk allocation and freeing of multiple mbufs increase more than ~2%
> > throughput on single core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mallesh Koujalagi <malleshx.koujalagi at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c | 16 +++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
> > index 9385ffd..247ede0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c
> > @@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ eth_null_copy_rx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> >  	packet_size = h->internals->packet_size;
> > +
> > +	if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(h->mb_pool, bufs, nb_bufs) != 0)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nb_bufs; i++) {
> > -		bufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(h->mb_pool);
> > -		if (!bufs[i])
> > -			break;
> >  		rte_memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(bufs[i], void *), h->dummy_packet,
> >  					packet_size);
> >  		bufs[i]->data_len = (uint16_t)packet_size;
> > @@ -149,18 +150,15 @@ eth_null_copy_rx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
> >  static uint16_t
> >  eth_null_tx(void *q, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_bufs)
> >  {
> > -	int i;
> >  	struct null_queue *h = q;
> >
> >  	if ((q == NULL) || (bufs == NULL))
> >  		return 0;
> >
> > -	for (i = 0; i < nb_bufs; i++)
> > -		rte_pktmbuf_free(bufs[i]);
> > +	rte_mempool_put_bulk(bufs[0]->pool, (void **)bufs, nb_bufs);
> 
> Is it guarantied that all mbufs will be from same mempool?

I don't think it does, plus
rte_pktmbuf_free(mb) != rte_mempool_put_bulk(mb->pool, &mb, 1);
Konstantin

> 
> > +	rte_atomic64_add(&h->tx_pkts, nb_bufs);
> >
> > -	rte_atomic64_add(&(h->tx_pkts), i);
> > -
> > -	return i;
> > +	return nb_bufs;
> >  }
> >
> >  static uint16_t
> >



More information about the dev mailing list