[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/41] Memory Hotplug for DPDK

Burakov, Anatoly anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Thu Mar 8 21:33:21 CET 2018


On 08-Mar-18 8:11 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 08-Mar-18 2:36 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 08-Mar-18 1:36 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote:
>>> Hi Anatoly,
>>>
>>> We are currently facing issues with running testpmd on thunderx 
>>> platform.
>>> The issue seems to be with vfio
>>>
>>> EAL: Detected 24 lcore(s)
>>> EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes
>>> EAL: No free hugepages reported in hugepages-2048kB
>>> EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/.rte_unix
>>> EAL: Probing VFIO support...
>>> EAL: VFIO support initialized
>>> EAL:   VFIO support not initialized
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> EAL:   probe driver: 177d:a053 octeontx_fpavf
>>> EAL: PCI device 0001:01:00.1 on NUMA socket 0
>>> EAL:   probe driver: 177d:a034 net_thunderx
>>> EAL:   using IOMMU type 1 (Type 1)
>>> EAL:   cannot set up DMA remapping, error 22 (Invalid argument)
>>> EAL:   0001:01:00.1 DMA remapping failed, error 22 (Invalid argument)
>>> EAL: Requested device 0001:01:00.1 cannot be used
>>> EAL: PCI device 0001:01:00.2 on NUMA socket 0
>>> <snip>
>>> testpmd: No probed ethernet devices
>>> testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mbuf_pool_socket_0>: n=251456, 
>>> size=2176, socket=0
>>> testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc
>>> EAL:   VFIO support not initialized
>>> EAL:   VFIO support not initialized
>>> EAL:   VFIO support not initialized
>>> Done
>>>
>>>
>>> This is because rte_service_init() calls rte_calloc() before
>>> rte_bus_probe() and vfio_dma_mem_map fails because iommu type is not 
>>> set.
>>>
>>> Call stack:
>>> gdb) bt
>>> #0  vfio_dma_mem_map (vaddr=281439006359552, iova=11274289152, 
>>> len=536870912, do_map=1) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c:967
>>> #1  0x00000000004fd974 in rte_vfio_dma_map (vaddr=281439006359552, 
>>> iova=11274289152, len=536870912) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c:988
>>> #2  0x00000000004fbe78 in vfio_mem_event_callback 
>>> (type=RTE_MEM_EVENT_ALLOC, addr=0xfff7a0000000, len=536870912) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c:240
>>> #3  0x00000000005070ac in eal_memalloc_notify 
>>> (event=RTE_MEM_EVENT_ALLOC, start=0xfff7a0000000, len=536870912) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memalloc.c:177
>>> #4  0x0000000000515c98 in try_expand_heap_primary 
>>> (heap=0xffffb7fb167c, pg_sz=536870912, elt_size=8192, socket=0, 
>>> flags=0, align=128, bound=0, contig=false) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c:247
>>> #5  0x0000000000515e94 in try_expand_heap (heap=0xffffb7fb167c, 
>>> pg_sz=536870912, elt_size=8192, socket=0, flags=0, align=128, 
>>> bound=0, contig=false) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c:327
>>> #6  0x00000000005163a0 in alloc_more_mem_on_socket 
>>> (heap=0xffffb7fb167c, size=8192, socket=0, flags=0, align=128, 
>>> bound=0, contig=false) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c:455
>>> #7  0x0000000000516514 in heap_alloc_on_socket (type=0x85bf90 
>>> "rte_services", size=8192, socket=0, flags=0, align=128, bound=0, 
>>> contig=false) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c:491
>>> #8  0x0000000000516664 in malloc_heap_alloc (type=0x85bf90 
>>> "rte_services", size=8192, socket_arg=-1, flags=0, align=128, 
>>> bound=0, contig=false) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c:527
>>> #9  0x0000000000513b54 in rte_malloc_socket (type=0x85bf90 
>>> "rte_services", size=8192, align=128, socket_arg=-1) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c:54
>>> #10 0x0000000000513bc8 in rte_zmalloc_socket (type=0x85bf90 
>>> "rte_services", size=8192, align=128, socket=-1) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c:72
>>> #11 0x0000000000513c00 in rte_zmalloc (type=0x85bf90 "rte_services", 
>>> size=8192, align=128) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c:81
>>> #12 0x0000000000513c90 in rte_calloc (type=0x85bf90 "rte_services", 
>>> num=64, size=128, align=128) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_malloc.c:99
>>> #13 0x0000000000518cec in rte_service_init () at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c:81
>>> #14 0x00000000004f55f4 in rte_eal_init (argc=3, argv=0xfffffffff488) 
>>> at /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c:959
>>> #15 0x000000000045af5c in main (argc=3, argv=0xfffffffff488) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c:2483
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, I have tried running with --legacy-mem but I'm stuck in
>>> `pci_find_max_end_va` loop  because `rte_fbarray_find_next_used` 
>>> always return
>>> 0. >
>>> HugePages_Total:      15
>>> HugePages_Free:       11
>>> HugePages_Rsvd:        0
>>> HugePages_Surp:        0
>>> Hugepagesize:     524288 kB
>>>
>>> Call Stack:
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0  find_next (arr=0xffffb7fb009c, start=0, used=true) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c:248
>>> #1  0x00000000005132a8 in rte_fbarray_find_next_used 
>>> (arr=0xffffb7fb009c, start=0) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c:700
>>> #2  0x000000000052d030 in pci_find_max_end_va () at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c:138
>>> #3  0x0000000000530ab8 in pci_vfio_map_resource_primary 
>>> (dev=0xeae700) at /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c:499
>>> #4  0x0000000000530ffc in pci_vfio_map_resource (dev=0xeae700) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c:601
>>> #5  0x000000000052ce90 in rte_pci_map_device (dev=0xeae700) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c:75
>>> #6  0x0000000000531a20 in rte_pci_probe_one_driver (dr=0x997e20 
>>> <rte_nicvf_pmd>, dev=0xeae700) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c:164
>>> #7  0x0000000000531c68 in pci_probe_all_drivers (dev=0xeae700) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c:249
>>> #8  0x0000000000531f68 in rte_pci_probe () at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c:359
>>> #9  0x000000000050a140 in rte_bus_probe () at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c:98
>>> #10 0x00000000004f55f4 in rte_eal_init (argc=1, argv=0xfffffffff498) 
>>> at /root/clean/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c:967
>>> #11 0x000000000045af5c in main (argc=1, argv=0xfffffffff498) at 
>>> /root/clean/dpdk/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c:2483
>>>
>>> Am I missing something here?
>>
>> I'll look into those, thanks!
>>
>> Btw, i've now set up a github repo with the patchset applied:
>>
>> https://github.com/anatolyburakov/dpdk
>>
>> I will be pushing quick fixes there before spinning new revisions, so 
>> we can discover and fix bugs more rapidly. I'll fix compile issues 
>> reported earlier, then i'll take a look at your issues. The latter one 
>> seems like a typo, the former is probably a matter of moving things 
>> around a bit.
>>
>> (also, pull requests welcome if you find it easier to fix things 
>> yourself and submit patches against my tree!)
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>>
> 
> I've looked into the failures.
> 
> The VFIO one is not actually a failure. It only prints out errors 
> because rte_malloc is called before VFIO is initialized. However, once 
> VFIO *is* initialized, all of that memory would be added to VFIO, so 
> these error messages are harmless. Regardless, i've added a check to see 
> if init is finished before printing out those errors, so they won't be 
> printed out any more.
> 
> Second one is a typo on my part that got lost in one of the rebases.
> 
> I've pushed fixes for both into the github repo.
> 

Although i do wonder where do the DMA remapping errors come from. The 
error message says "invalid argument", so that doesn't come from 
rte_service or anything to do with rte_malloc - this is us not providing 
valid arguments to VFIO. I'm not seeing these errors on my system. I'll 
check on others to be sure.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly


More information about the dev mailing list