[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/i40e: enable runtime queue setup

Zhang, Qi Z qi.z.zhang at intel.com
Mon Mar 26 10:49:55 CEST 2018



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 3:46 AM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; thomas at monjalon.net
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu at intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] net/i40e: enable runtime queue setup
> 
> Hi Qi,
> 
> >
> > Expose the runtime queue configuration capability and enhance
> > i40e_dev_[rx|tx]_queue_setup to handle the situation when device
> > already started.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - no queue start/stop in setup/release
> > - return fail when required rx/tx function conflict with
> >   exist setup
> >
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c |  4 +++
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c   | 64
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 508b4171c..68960dcaa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -3197,6 +3197,10 @@ i40e_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
> >  		DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO |
> >  		DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO |
> >  		DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO;
> > +	dev_info->runtime_queue_setup_capa =
> > +		DEV_RUNTIME_RX_QUEUE_SETUP |
> > +		DEV_RUNTIME_TX_QUEUE_SETUP;
> > +
> >  	dev_info->hash_key_size = (I40E_PFQF_HKEY_MAX_INDEX + 1) *
> >  						sizeof(uint32_t);
> >  	dev_info->reta_size = pf->hash_lut_size; diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> > 1217e5a61..9eb009d63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > @@ -1712,6 +1712,7 @@ i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >  	uint16_t len, i;
> >  	uint16_t reg_idx, base, bsf, tc_mapping;
> >  	int q_offset, use_def_burst_func = 1;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> >
> >  	if (hw->mac.type == I40E_MAC_VF || hw->mac.type ==
> I40E_MAC_X722_VF) {
> >  		vf = I40EVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data->dev_private);
> > @@ -1841,6 +1842,36 @@ i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >  			rxq->dcb_tc = i;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	if (dev->data->dev_started) {
> > +		ret = i40e_rx_queue_init(rxq);
> > +		if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> > +			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
> > +				    "Failed to do RX queue initialization");
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> 
> We probably also have to do here:
> 
> if (use_def_burst_func != 0 && ad-> rx_bulk_alloc_allowed) {error;}
> 
> and we have to do that before we assign ad-> rx_bulk_alloc_allowed (inside
> rx_queue_setup() few lines above).

Got your point and agree with all following comments.

Thanks
Qi 
> 
> 
> > +		/* check vector conflict */
> > +		if (ad->rx_vec_allowed) {
> > +			if (i40e_rxq_vec_setup(rxq)) {
> > +				PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed vector rx setup");
> > +				i40e_dev_rx_queue_release(rxq);
> > +				return -EINVAL;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +		/* check scatterred conflict */
> > +		if (!dev->data->scattered_rx) {
> > +			uint16_t buf_size =
> > +				(uint16_t)(rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(rxq->mp) -
> > +					   RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
> > +
> > +			if ((rxq->max_pkt_len + 2 * I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE) >
> > +				buf_size) {
> > +				PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Scattered rx is required");
> > +				i40e_dev_rx_queue_release(rxq);
> > +				return -EINVAL;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1980,6 +2011,8 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >  			const struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf)  {
> >  	struct i40e_hw *hw =
> I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > +	struct i40e_adapter *ad =
> > +		I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data->dev_private);
> >  	struct i40e_vsi *vsi;
> >  	struct i40e_pf *pf = NULL;
> >  	struct i40e_vf *vf = NULL;
> > @@ -1989,6 +2022,7 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >  	uint16_t tx_rs_thresh, tx_free_thresh;
> >  	uint16_t reg_idx, i, base, bsf, tc_mapping;
> >  	int q_offset;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> >
> >  	if (hw->mac.type == I40E_MAC_VF || hw->mac.type ==
> I40E_MAC_X722_VF) {
> >  		vf = I40EVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data->dev_private);
> > @@ -2162,6 +2196,36 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >  			txq->dcb_tc = i;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	if (dev->data->dev_started) {
> > +		ret = i40e_tx_queue_init(txq);
> > +		if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> > +			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
> > +				    "Failed to do TX queue initialization");
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* check vector conflict */
> > +		if (ad->tx_vec_allowed) {
> 
> Same thing here:
> i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup()->i40e_set_tx_function_flag()
> can change both ad->tx_vec_allowed and tx_simple_allowed.
> I think we have to do that check before device settings are affected.
> 
> > +			if (txq->tx_rs_thresh > RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ ||
> > +			    i40e_txq_vec_setup(txq)) {
> > +				PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed vector tx setup");
> > +				i40e_dev_tx_queue_release(txq);
> > +				return -EINVAL;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* check simple tx conflict */
> > +		if (ad->tx_simple_allowed) {
> > +			if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) !=
> > +			     I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) ||
> > +			    (txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST)) {
> > +			}
> > +			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "No-simple tx is required");
> > +			i40e_dev_tx_queue_release(txq);
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> As a nit - probably worth to move functionality under if
> (dev->data->dev_started) {...} into a separate function for both TX and RX.
> Konstantin
> 
> 
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.13.6



More information about the dev mailing list