[dpdk-dev] [v3, 2/5] eventdev: add APIs and PMD callbacks for crypto adapter

[Jerin Jacob]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 00:17:07 +0530
> From: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar at intel.com>
> To: jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal at nxp.com,
>  akhil.goyal at nxp.com, dev at dpdk.org
> CC: narender.vangati at intel.com, abhinandan.gujjar at intel.com,
>  nikhil.rao at intel.com, gage.eads at intel.com
> Subject: [v3,2/5] eventdev: add APIs and PMD callbacks for crypto adapter
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c            |  13 +++
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c     |  25 +++++
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h     |  54 ++++++++++
>  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
> 
> --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  #ifndef _RTE_EVENTDEV_H_
>  #define _RTE_EVENTDEV_H_
>  
> +#include <rte_compat.h>

Why rte_compat.h ? Is it by mistake? I could compile without this change.

> +
>  /**
>   * @file
>   *
> @@ -1135,6 +1137,58 @@ struct rte_event {
>  int __rte_experimental
>  rte_event_timer_adapter_caps_get(uint8_t dev_id, uint32_t *caps);
>  
> @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@
>  		((RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_OVERRIDE_FLOW_ID) | \
>  			(RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_MULTI_EVENTQ))
>  
> +#define RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_SW_CAP \
> +		RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_SESSION_PRIVATE_DATA

I thought, SW driver has support for RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT_QP_EV_BIND.
If not, please ignore this comment.


With above changes:
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>