[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto/scheduler: fix possible duplicated ring names

[De Lara Guarch, Pablo]

Hi Fan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Roy Fan
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 11:09 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>; Rybalchenko, Kirill
> <kirill.rybalchenko at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] crypto/scheduler: fix possible duplicated ring names
> 
> Fixes: 4c07e0552f0a ("crypto/scheduler: add multicore scheduling mode")

Fixes line goes before "Signed-off-by" and after the description of the patch.
Also, CC: stable at dpdk.org should go after Fixes line.

> 
> This patch fixes the possible duplicated ring names in multi-core scheduler.
> Originally two or more multi-core schedulers may have same worker ring names
> thus will cause initialization error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_multicore.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_multicore.c
> b/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_multicore.c
> index 644426e93..cd71d18ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_multicore.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_multicore.c
> @@ -347,14 +347,18 @@ scheduler_create_private_ctx(struct rte_cryptodev
> *dev)
>  	for (i = 0; i < sched_ctx->nb_wc; i++) {
>  		char r_name[16];
> 
> -		snprintf(r_name, sizeof(r_name),
> MC_SCHED_ENQ_RING_NAME_PREFIX "%u", i);
> +		snprintf(r_name, sizeof(r_name),
> +				MC_SCHED_ENQ_RING_NAME_PREFIX "%u",
> +				sched_ctx->wc_pool[i]);

We could potentially have 2 scheduler sharing same cores, right?
I mean, performance wise, it doesn't make sense, but it should still work.
In this case, it wouldn't work, so we might need a different name.
I'd say using the scheduler id and the index "i" should work.

Thanks,
Pablo