[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits
Iremonger, Bernard
bernard.iremonger at intel.com
Thu May 17 11:26:15 CEST 2018
Hi Adrien,
<snip>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits
> > >
> > > The following commits lack MAINTAINERS entries for this mess.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4d73b6fb9907 ("doc: add generic flow API guide")
> > > Fixes: 19c90af6285c ("app/testpmd: add flow command")
> > > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com>
> > > Cc: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index bd08d4292..187817fff
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ F: devtools/test-null.sh Flow API
> > > M: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com>
> > > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
> > > +F: app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> >
> > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > Should be added to the list of flow related files.
>
> I did not add it because there is no way to split responsibility on a
> documentation section basis AFAIK, and only a fraction of this file contains
> information about rte_flow-related stuff.
>
> --
> Adrien Mazarguil
> 6WIND
There are already several maintainers for testpmd, adding another maintainer for the flow parts of this file should be ok (I think).
Regards,
Bernard
More information about the dev
mailing list