[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoUDP encapsulation

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Wed Nov 21 16:19:04 CET 2018


On 11/20/2018 8:23 AM, Ori Kam wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Dekel Peled
>> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 6:55 PM
>> To: wenzhuo.lu at intel.com; jingjing.wu at intel.com;
>> bernard.iremonger at intel.com
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
>> <shahafs at mellanox.com>; Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoUDP encapsulation
>>
>> Set MPLS label value in appropriate location at mplsoudp_encap_conf,
>> so it is correctly copied to rte_flow_item_mpls.
>>
>> Fixes: a1191d39cb57 ("app/testpmd: add MPLSoUDP encapsulation")
>> Cc: orika at mellanox.com
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
>> ---
>>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> index 1275074..40e64cc 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -15804,10 +15804,10 @@ static void
>> cmd_set_mplsoudp_encap_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>  	struct cmd_set_mplsoudp_encap_result *res = parsed_result;
>>  	union {
>>  		uint32_t mplsoudp_label;
>> -		uint8_t label[3];
>> +		uint8_t label[4];
>>  	} id = {
>>  		.mplsoudp_label =
>> -			rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label) & RTE_BE32(0x00ffffff),
>> +			rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label<<4) &
>> RTE_BE32(0x00ffffff),
>>  	};
>>
>>  	if (strcmp(res->mplsoudp, "mplsoudp_encap") == 0)
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
> 
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>

Hi Ori, Dekel,

What is the scope of this patch? Briefly how critical it is and what will be
broken and what is exposure of it?


More information about the dev mailing list