[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] crypto/aesni_mb: support plain SHA

[De Lara Guarch, Pablo]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch,
> Pablo
> Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 10:32 PM
> To: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: akhil.goyal at nxp.com; Nowak, DamianX <damianx.nowak at intel.com>;
> Krakowiak, LukaszX <lukaszx.krakowiak at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] crypto/aesni_mb: support plain SHA
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trahe, Fiona
> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 5:52 PM
> > To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: akhil.goyal at nxp.com; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> > <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; Nowak, DamianX
> > <damianx.nowak at intel.com>; Krakowiak, LukaszX
> > <lukaszx.krakowiak at intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] crypto/aesni_mb: support plain SHA
> >
> > Hi Fan,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Fan Zhang
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 5:22 AM
> > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Cc: akhil.goyal at nxp.com; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> > > <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; Nowak, DamianX
> > > <damianx.nowak at intel.com>; Krakowiak, LukaszX
> > > <lukaszx.krakowiak at intel.com>
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] crypto/aesni_mb: support plain SHA
> > >
> > > This patch adds the plain SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, and SHA512
> > > algorithms support to AESNI-MB PMD. The cryptodev unit test and
> > > documentation are updated accordingly.
> > >
> > > This patch depends on "[v6] crypto/aesni_mb: support AES-GMAC"
> > > (http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/49180/)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Damian Nowak <damianx.nowak at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Krakowiak <lukaszx.krakowiak at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>
> > > ---
> >
> >
> > //snip//
> >
> > > @@ -428,7 +433,12 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case
> > hash_test_cases[] = {
> > >  		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
> > >  			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
> > >  			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
> > > +#if IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0) > IMB_VERSION_NUM
> > >  			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX
> > > +#else
> > > +			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
> > > +			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB #endif
> > [Fiona] Only a nit, but it's messy to include OCTEONTX in this.
> > MB doesn't have to be added after the other flags, it would be more
> > readable and easier for other PMD flags to be added in future if it
> > was put on the previous line, e.g.
> > >  			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
> > > +#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
> > > +			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB  | #endif
> > >  			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX
> >
> > Apart from that
> > Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <fiona.trahe at intel.com>
> 
> Agree with Fiona's comment.
> Fan, are you ok with it? I can make the change for you and push it to the
> tree.

After verbal agreement, I made the change and pushed it to the tree.
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto.

Thanks,
Pablo

> 
> Pablo