[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] ethdev: add actions to modify TCP header fields

[Adrien Mazarguil]

On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:59:08AM +0300, Dekel Peled wrote:
> Add actions:
> - INC_TCP_SEQ - Increase sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
> - DEC_TCP_SEQ - Decrease sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
> - INC_TCP_ACK - Increase acknowledgment number in the outermost TCP
> 		header.
> - DEC_TCP_ACK - Decrease acknowledgment number in the outermost TCP
> 		header.
> 
> Original work by Xiaoyu Min.
> 
> This patch introduces a new approach, using a simple integer instead
> of using an action-specific structure for each of these actions.
> This approach can be later applied to modify existing actions which
> require only a single integer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>

You didn't take Andrew's comment [1] into account, this patch must be
split. I'll highlight what needs to be moved to a pre-patch below.

[1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-June/136101.html

[...]
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> index a34d012..783a904 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> @@ -1214,7 +1214,8 @@ Actions
>  ~~~~~~~
>  
>  Each possible action is represented by a type. Some have associated
> -configuration structures. Several actions combined in a list can be assigned
> +configuration structures, some others use a simple integer.
> +Several actions combined in a list can be assigned
>  to a flow rule and are performed in order.

^^^^ This must be moved to a separate patch ^^^^

BTW, how about "configuration structure" -> "configuration object"
encompassing all kinds of objects once and for all instead? Such a generic
term will be handy when actions start using floats or function pointers.

[...]
>  /**
> @@ -2140,7 +2172,7 @@ struct rte_flow_action_set_mac {
>   */
>  struct rte_flow_action {
>  	enum rte_flow_action_type type; /**< Action type. */
> -	const void *conf; /**< Pointer to action configuration structure. */
> +	const void *conf; /**< Pointer to action configuration. */
>  };

^^^^ This must be moved to a separate patch ^^^^

Same comment regarding "configuration object".

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND