[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbvef
David Harton (dharton)
dharton at cisco.com
Fri Mar 8 13:38:43 CET 2019
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 1:35 AM
> To: David Harton (dharton) <dharton at cisco.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> ixgbvef
>
> Hi, David Harton
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Harton
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 11:24 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Ananyev,
> > Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > Cc: David Harton <dharton at cisco.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> > ixgbvef
> >
> > ixgevf vlan strip and extend capabilities were removed when migrating
> > to the bit flags implementation.
> >
> > Restoring the capbility to enable these offloads at configuration time.
> >
> > Fixes: ec3b1124d14d (\"net/ixgbe: convert to new Rx offloads API\")
> > Signed-off-by: David Harton <dharton at cisco.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index e92a70fb3..95c32257c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -2853,15 +2853,13 @@ ixgbe_get_rx_port_offloads(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev)
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC |
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME |
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND |
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> >
>
> Why do we set DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND for ixgbevf ?
> It seems Ixgbevf do not support this configuration. Only pf does.
> But this ixgbe_get_rx_port_offloads () is used by both vf and pf.
I'm personally happy only to move FILTER but I noticed that EXTEND used to be 'supported' and I see references to it elsewhere in ixgbevf code:
ixgbevf_dev_start()
/* Set HW strip */
mask = ETH_VLAN_STRIP_MASK | ETH_VLAN_FILTER_MASK |
ETH_VLAN_EXTEND_MASK;
ixgbe_vlan_offload_config()
if (mask & ETH_VLAN_EXTEND_MASK) {
if (rxmode->offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND)
ixgbe_vlan_hw_extend_enable(dev);
else
ixgbe_vlan_hw_extend_disable(dev);
}
These uses imply that EXTEND should be supported, correct?
Thanks,
Dave
>
>
> > if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82598EB)
> > offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> >
> > - if (ixgbe_is_vf(dev) == 0)
> > - offloads |= (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND);
> > -
> > /*
> > * RSC is only supported by 82599 and x540 PF devices in a non-SR-
> > IOV
> > * mode.
> > --
> > 2.19.1
More information about the dev
mailing list