[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf

[Zhang, Qi Z]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Harton (dharton) [mailto:dharton at cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:51 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf
> 
> Hi Qi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:14 AM
> > To: David Harton (dharton) <dharton at cisco.com>
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> > ixgbevf
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Harton (dharton) [mailto:dharton at cisco.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 9:38 PM
> > > To: David Harton (dharton) <dharton at cisco.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > > <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> > > ixgbevf
> > >
> > > Hi Qi,
> > >
> > > This patch was rejected with no feedback.
> > >
> > > Can you share why?
> >
> > Because as Zhao Wei explained in v1 thread, in
> > ixgbe_vlan_offload_config , ETH_VLAN_FILTER_MASK and
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND are ignored This looks like VLAN_FILTER
> AND
> > VLAN_EXTEND offload is not supported and I didn't see you reply for that, so I
> assume you agree with that.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Without this patch users are not able to call the
> > > rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter() API for ixgbevf based ports because
> > > VLAN_FILTER cannot be enabled when calling rte_eth_dev_configure().
> >
> > OK, seems vlan filter is able to be configured for ixgbevf, but I
> > don't know how this will work because vlan filter table needs to be
> > enabled first (ixgbe_vlan_hw_filter_enable) So at least when it work
> > with a DPDK PF, vlan filter will not work, maybe kernel PF driver will
> > enable it by default? Could you share more insight?
> 
> I can't answer that but ixgbevf_vlan_filter_set() has been implemented for quite
> some time and it can no longer be called since the new offload flags are being
> enforced now.
> 
> I can share that rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter()/ixgbevf_vlan_filter_set() works
> properly with the propose change (VLAN traffic flows) where it doesn't without
> it.

Ok, if it is proved to work well with kernel PF, I think we should have this offload
> 
> >
> > And same question to VLAN_EXTEND
> 
> I actually don't care about extend but simply changed it because it seems to be in
> the same situation.  I'm happy to leave it  out of the patch if that grants
> acceptance.

Seems VLAN Extend is only supported by DPDK PF driver, I didn't see any related configuration in kernel driver.
Properly we need to remove it.

@Wei, would you help to confirm on that?

Thanks
Qi

> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Or, am I missing something?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: David Harton <dharton at cisco.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 3:35 PM
> > > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: wenzhuo.lu at intel.com; konstantin.ananyev at intel.com;
> > > > qi.z.zhang at intel.com; David Harton (dharton) <dharton at cisco.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> > > > ixgbevf
> > > >
> > > > ixgbevf vlan strip and extend capabilities were removed when
> > > > migrating to the bit flags implementation.
> > > >
> > > > Restoring the capbility to enable these offloads at configuration
> > time.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: ec3b1124d14d (\"net/ixgbe: convert to new Rx offloads
> > > > API\")
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Harton <dharton at cisco.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > v2: removed unused function ixgbe_is_vf()
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 23 ++---------------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index e92a70fb3..b1b83613e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > > @@ -2813,23 +2813,6 @@ ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_adapter
> > > > *adapter, struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)  #endif  }
> > > >
> > > > -static int
> > > > -ixgbe_is_vf(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) -{
> > > > -	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> > > > >dev_private);
> > > > -
> > > > -	switch (hw->mac.type) {
> > > > -	case ixgbe_mac_82599_vf:
> > > > -	case ixgbe_mac_X540_vf:
> > > > -	case ixgbe_mac_X550_vf:
> > > > -	case ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x_vf:
> > > > -	case ixgbe_mac_X550EM_a_vf:
> > > > -		return 1;
> > > > -	default:
> > > > -		return 0;
> > > > -	}
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > >  uint64_t
> > > >  ixgbe_get_rx_queue_offloads(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)  { @@
> > > > -2853,15
> > > > +2836,13 @@ ixgbe_get_rx_port_offloads(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > > >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM   |
> > > >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC    |
> > > >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME |
> > > > +		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > > > +		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND |
> > > >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> > > >
> > > >  	if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82598EB)
> > > >  		offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> > > >
> > > > -	if (ixgbe_is_vf(dev) == 0)
> > > > -		offloads |= (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > > > -			     DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND);
> > > > -
> > > >  	/*
> > > >  	 * RSC is only supported by 82599 and x540 PF devices in a
> > > > non-SR- IOV
> > > >  	 * mode.
> > > > --
> > > > 2.19.1