[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] lib/mbuf: introduce helper to create mempool with flags

Ye Xiaolong xiaolong.ye at intel.com
Sun Mar 24 10:08:35 CET 2019


On 03/22, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
>On 3/22/19 2:01 PM, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>> This allows applications to create mbuf mempool with specific flags
>> such as MEMPOOL_F_NO_SPREAD if they want fixed size memory objects.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>
>> +/**
>> + * Create a mbuf pool with flags.
>> + *
>> + * This function creates and initializes a packet mbuf pool. It is
>> + * a wrapper to rte_mempool functions.
>> + *
>> + * @warning
>> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: This API may change without prior notice.
>> + *
>> + * @param name
>> + *   The name of the mbuf pool.
>> + * @param n
>> + *   The number of elements in the mbuf pool. The optimum size (in terms
>> + *   of memory usage) for a mempool is when n is a power of two minus one:
>> + *   n = (2^q - 1).
>> + * @param cache_size
>> + *   Size of the per-core object cache. See rte_mempool_create() for
>> + *   details.
>> + * @param priv_size
>> + *   Size of application private are between the rte_mbuf structure
>> + *   and the data buffer. This value must be aligned to RTE_MBUF_PRIV_ALIGN.
>> + * @param data_room_size
>> + *   Size of data buffer in each mbuf, including RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM.
>> + * @param flags
>> + *   Flags controlling the behavior of the mempool. See
>> + *   rte_mempool_create() for details.
>> + * @param socket_id
>> + *   The socket identifier where the memory should be allocated. The
>> + *   value can be *SOCKET_ID_ANY* if there is no NUMA constraint for the
>> + *   reserved zone.
>> + * @return
>> + *   The pointer to the new allocated mempool, on success. NULL on error
>> + *   with rte_errno set appropriately. Possible rte_errno values include:
>> + *    - E_RTE_NO_CONFIG - function could not get pointer to rte_config structure
>> + *    - E_RTE_SECONDARY - function was called from a secondary process instance
>> + *    - EINVAL - cache size provided is too large, or priv_size is not aligned.
>> + *    - ENOSPC - the maximum number of memzones has already been allocated
>> + *    - EEXIST - a memzone with the same name already exists
>> + *    - ENOMEM - no appropriate memory area found in which to create memzone
>> + */
>> +struct rte_mempool * __rte_experimental
>> +rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_with_flags(const char *name, unsigned int n,
>> +	unsigned int cache_size, uint16_t priv_size, uint16_t data_room_size,
>> +	unsigned int flags, int socket_id);
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * Create a mbuf pool with a given mempool ops name
>>    *
>> 
>
>You need to add it to rte_mbuf_version.map too.

Got it, will add in next version.

Thanks,
Xiaolong


More information about the dev mailing list