[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
Luca Boccassi
bluca at debian.org
Wed Mar 27 18:25:47 CET 2019
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> from major contributors for validation of the releases.
>
> Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <
> ktraynor at redhat.com
> >
> ---
>
> v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
>
> doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..b63cd4228 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
>
> Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> major
> +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> designated
> +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> release.
>
> A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> back to an
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
More information about the dev
mailing list