[dpdk-dev] [RFC v8] /net: memory interface (memif)

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Thu, 16 May 2019 13:46:58 +0200
Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia at cisco.com> wrote:

> +enum memif_role_t {
> +	MEMIF_ROLE_MASTER,
> +	MEMIF_ROLE_SLAVE,
> +};

Because master/slave terminology is potentially culturally offensive it
is flagged by many corporate source scanning tools.

Could you use primary/secondary in memif instead?