[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] ethdev: do nothing if all-multicast mode is applied again
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Sep 24 10:36:50 CEST 2019
On 9/9/2019 1:13 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> Since driver callbacks return status code now, there is no necessity
> to enable or disable all-multicast mode once again if it is already
> successfully enabled or disabled.
>
> Configuration restore at startup tries to ensure that configured
> all-multicast mode is applied and start will return error if it fails.
>
> Also it avoids theoretical cases when already configured all-multicast
> mode is applied once again and fails. In this cases it is unclear
> which value should be reported on get (configured or opposite).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index 8115226c91..e1921e8225 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -1416,16 +1416,22 @@ rte_eth_dev_config_restore(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> }
>
> /* replay all multicast configuration */
> - if (rte_eth_allmulticast_get(port_id) == 1) {
> - ret = rte_eth_allmulticast_enable(port_id);
> + /*
> + * use callbacks directly since we don't need port_id check and
> + * would like to bypass the same value set
> + */
> + if (rte_eth_allmulticast_get(port_id) == 1 &&
> + *dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable != NULL) {
> + ret = (*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable)(dev);
I am for using the API here, it is more abstract instead of adding the dev_ops
null checks etc. Will there be any downside to use the API?
<...>
> @@ -1962,16 +1968,17 @@ int
> rte_eth_allmulticast_enable(uint16_t port_id)
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> - uint8_t old_allmulticast;
> - int diag;
> + int diag = 0;
>
> RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>
> RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable, -ENOTSUP);
> - old_allmulticast = dev->data->all_multicast;
> - diag = (*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable)(dev);
> - dev->data->all_multicast = (diag == 0) ? 1 : old_allmulticast;
> +
> + if (dev->data->all_multicast == 0) {
What about adding this check even before 'allmulticast_enable' check, so if the
multicast is already enabled why bother having dev_ops or not:
if (dev->data->all_multicast == 1)
return eth_err(port_id, diag);
> + diag = (*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable)(dev);
> + dev->data->all_multicast = (diag == 0) ? 1 : 0;
> + }
>
> return eth_err(port_id, diag);
> }
> @@ -1980,18 +1987,19 @@ int
> rte_eth_allmulticast_disable(uint16_t port_id)
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> - uint8_t old_allmulticast;
> - int diag;
> + int diag = 0;
>
> RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>
> RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_disable, -ENOTSUP);
> - old_allmulticast = dev->data->all_multicast;
> - dev->data->all_multicast = 0;
> - diag = (*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_disable)(dev);
> - if (diag != 0)
> - dev->data->all_multicast = old_allmulticast;
> +
> + if (dev->data->all_multicast == 1) {
Same comment with above, can we move this check above..
> + dev->data->all_multicast = 0;
> + diag = (*dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_disable)(dev);
> + if (diag != 0)
> + dev->data->all_multicast = 1;
> + }
>
> return eth_err(port_id, diag);
> }
>
More information about the dev
mailing list