[dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning with whitelist/blacklist

[Sunil Kumar Kori]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Sunil Kumar Kori
>Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:30 PM
>To: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
>Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj at marvell.com>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>;
>Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] bus/pci: optimise scanning
>with whitelist/blacklist
>
>Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
>On 17-Apr-2020 9:06 PM, David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:12 PM Sunil Kumar Kori <skori at marvell.com>
>wrote:
>> > >Your current patch is a no go anyway.
>> > >The __rte_experimental tagging makes no sense.
>> >
>> > That’s not a problem.  My only intention is to resolve a problem
>> > what we have observed and corresponding fix caters a practical use case.
>> > If you don’t like the way it is implemented then we can go with your
>suggested way.
>> > Please let me know, will you be sending that github patch or should I send
>?
>>
>> And again.
>> The experimental tag is *useless*.
>> private.h is not exported to users, the symbol you want to add is
>> internal to the pci bus library.
>>
>> I will stop at this.
>>
>Got it. If it's only about exporting the symbol to the user then I will send next
>version of my patch after removing __rte_experimental and will make symbol
>to internal.

Uploaded v3.

>>
>> --
>> David Marchand
>>