[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rcu: avoid literal suffix warning in C++ mode
Dmitry Kozlyuk
dmitry.kozliuk at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 23:38:11 CEST 2020
Sequences like "value = %"PRIu64 (no space before PRIu64) are parsed as
a single preprocessor token, user-defined-string-literal, in C++11
onwards. While modern compilers are smart enough to parse this properly,
GCC 9.3.0 generates warnings like:
rte_rcu_qsbr.h:555:26: warning: invalid suffix on literal; C++11
requires a space between literal and string macro [-Wliteral-suffix]
Add spaces around format specifier macros to make public headers
compatible with C++ without causing warnings.
Fixes: 64994b56c ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism")
Cc: stable at dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk at gmail.com>
---
lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
index a98e8f0f8..aa237cf75 100644
--- a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
+++ b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, unsigned int thread_id)
__atomic_store_n(&v->qsbr_cnt[thread_id].cnt,
t, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
- __RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG, "%s: update: token = %"PRIu64", Thread ID = %d",
+ __RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG, "%s: update: token = %" PRIu64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, thread_id);
}
@@ -580,13 +580,13 @@ __rte_rcu_qsbr_check_selective(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, uint64_t t, bool wait)
while (bmap) {
j = __builtin_ctzl(bmap);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: check: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Bit Map = 0x%"PRIx64", Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: check: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Bit Map = 0x%" PRIx64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, bmap, id + j);
c = __atomic_load_n(
&v->qsbr_cnt[id + j].cnt,
__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: status: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %"PRIu64", Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: status: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %" PRIu64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, c, id+j);
/* Counter is not checked for wrap-around condition
@@ -643,12 +643,12 @@ __rte_rcu_qsbr_check_all(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, uint64_t t, bool wait)
for (i = 0, cnt = v->qsbr_cnt; i < v->max_threads; i++, cnt++) {
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: check: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: check: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, i);
while (1) {
c = __atomic_load_n(&cnt->cnt, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: status: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %"PRIu64", Thread ID = %d",
+ "%s: status: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d, Thread QS cnt = %" PRIu64 ", Thread ID = %d",
__func__, t, wait, c, i);
/* Counter is not checked for wrap-around condition
@@ -725,10 +725,10 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_check(struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v, uint64_t t, bool wait)
/* Check if all the readers have already acknowledged this token */
if (likely(t <= v->acked_token)) {
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: check: token = %"PRIu64", wait = %d",
+ "%s: check: token = %" PRIu64 ", wait = %d",
__func__, t, wait);
__RTE_RCU_DP_LOG(DEBUG,
- "%s: status: least acked token = %"PRIu64"",
+ "%s: status: least acked token = %" PRIu64,
__func__, v->acked_token);
return 1;
}
--
2.25.4
More information about the dev
mailing list