[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/service: fix race condition on stopping lcore
Phil Yang
Phil.Yang at arm.com
Tue Jul 21 10:38:58 CEST 2020
<...>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/service: fix race condition on
> stopping lcore
>
> This commit fixes a potential race condition in the tests
> where the lcore running a service would increment a counter
> that was already reset by the test-suite thread. The resulting
> race-condition incremented value could cause CI failures, as
> indicated by DPDK's CI.
>
> This patch fixes the race-condition by making use of the
> added rte_service_lcore_active() API, which indicates when
> a service-core is no longer in the service-core polling loop.
>
> The unit test makes use of the above function to detect when
> all statistics increments are done in the service-core thread,
> and then the unit test continues finalizing and checking state.
>
> Fixes: f28f3594ded2 ("service: add attribute API")
>
> Reported-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
Minor nit, otherwise it looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang at arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> Thanks for discussion on v1, this v2 fixup for the CI
> including previous feedback on ML.
> ---
> app/test/test_service_cores.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_service_cores.c b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> index ef1d8fcb9..a45762915 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ service_lcore_attr_get(void)
> "Service core add did not return zero");
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_map_lcore_set(id, slcore_id, 1),
> "Enabling valid service and core failed");
> + /* Ensure service is not active before starting */
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_lcore_active(slcore_id),
> + "Not-active service core reported as active");
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_lcore_start(slcore_id),
> "Starting service core failed");
>
> @@ -382,7 +385,24 @@ service_lcore_attr_get(void)
> lcore_attr_id, &lcore_attr_value),
> "Invalid lcore attr didn't return -EINVAL");
>
> - rte_service_lcore_stop(slcore_id);
> + /* Ensure service is active */
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(1, rte_service_lcore_active(slcore_id),
> + "Active service core reported as not-active");
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_map_lcore_set(id, slcore_id, 0),
> + "Disabling valid service and core failed");
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_lcore_stop(slcore_id),
> + "Failed to stop service lcore");
> +
> + int i = 0;
> + while (rte_service_lcore_active(slcore_id) == 1) {
> + rte_delay_ms(1);
Just as it does in other functions, use the macro instead of the magic number would be better.
rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
> + i++;
> + if (i > 100)
> + break;
> + }
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_lcore_active(slcore_id),
> + "Service lcore not stopped after waiting.");
>
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_lcore_attr_reset_all(slcore_id),
> "Valid lcore_attr_reset_all() didn't return success");
> --
> 2.17.1
More information about the dev
mailing list