[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] test/hash: add additional thash tests

[Medvedkin, Vladimir]

Hello David,

Oh, interesting, thanks for the report, I'll take a look!

On 29/04/2021 12:13, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Vladimir,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Vladimir Medvedkin
> <vladimir.medvedkin at intel.com> wrote:
>> +static int
>> +test_adjust_tuple(void)
>> +{
>> +       struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx;
>> +       struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h;
>> +       const int key_len = 40;
>> +       const uint8_t *new_key;
>> +       uint8_t tuple[TUPLE_SZ];
>> +       uint32_t tmp_tuple[TUPLE_SZ / sizeof(uint32_t)];
>> +       uint32_t tuple_copy[TUPLE_SZ / sizeof(uint32_t)];
>> +       uint32_t hash;
>> +       int reta_sz = CHAR_BIT;
>> +       int ret;
>> +       unsigned int i, desired_value = rte_rand() & HASH_MSK(reta_sz);
>> +
>> +       memset(tuple, 0xab, TUPLE_SZ);
>> +
>> +       ctx = rte_thash_init_ctx("test", key_len, reta_sz, NULL, 0);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ctx != NULL, "can not create thash ctx\n");
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * set offset to be in the middle of a byte
>> +        * set size of the subtuple to be 2 * rets_sz
>> +        * to have the room for random bits
>> +        */
>> +       ret = rte_thash_add_helper(ctx, "test", reta_sz * 2,
>> +               (5 * CHAR_BIT) + 4);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "can not add helper, ret %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> +       new_key = rte_thash_get_key(ctx);
>> +
>> +       h = rte_thash_get_helper(ctx, "test");
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(h != NULL, "can not find helper\n");
>> +
>> +       ret = rte_thash_adjust_tuple(ctx, h, tuple, TUPLE_SZ, desired_value,
>> +               1, NULL, NULL);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "can not adjust tuple, ret %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < (TUPLE_SZ / 4); i++)
>> +               tmp_tuple[i] =
>> +                       rte_be_to_cpu_32(*(uint32_t *)&tuple[i * 4]);
>> +
>> +       hash = rte_softrss(tmp_tuple, TUPLE_SZ / 4, new_key);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT((hash & HASH_MSK(reta_sz)) ==
>> +               desired_value, "bad desired value\n");
>> +
>> +
>> +       /* Pass previously calculated tuple to callback function */
>> +       memcpy(tuple_copy, tuple, TUPLE_SZ);
>> +
>> +       memset(tuple, 0xab, TUPLE_SZ);
>> +       ret = rte_thash_adjust_tuple(ctx, h, tuple, TUPLE_SZ, desired_value,
>> +               1, cmp_tuple_eq, tuple_copy);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == -EEXIST,
>> +               "adjust tuple didn't indicate collision\n");
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * Make the function to generate random bits into subtuple
>> +        * after first adjustment attempt.
>> +        */
>> +       memset(tuple, 0xab, TUPLE_SZ);
>> +       ret = rte_thash_adjust_tuple(ctx, h, tuple, TUPLE_SZ, desired_value,
>> +               2, cmp_tuple_eq, tuple_copy);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "can not adjust tuple, ret %d\n", ret);
> 
> 
> This check failed at least once in the CI, for no obvious (for me) reason.
> https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions/runs/794713806
> 
> 87/96 DPDK:fast-tests / thash_autotest        FAIL     0.17 s (exit
> status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
> 
> --- command ---
> DPDK_TEST='thash_autotest'
> /home/runner/work/dpdk/dpdk/build/app/test/dpdk-test -l 0-1
> --file-prefix=thash_autotest
> --- stdout ---
> RTE>>thash_autotest
>   + ------------------------------------------------------- +
>   + Test Suite : thash autotest
>   + ------------------------------------------------------- +
>   + TestCase [ 0] : test_toeplitz_hash_calc succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 1] : test_create_invalid succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 2] : test_multiple_create succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 3] : test_free_null succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 4] : test_add_invalid_helper succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 5] : test_find_existing succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 6] : test_get_helper succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 7] : test_period_overflow succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 8] : test_predictable_rss_min_seq succeeded
>   + TestCase [ 9] : test_predictable_rss_multirange succeeded
>   + TestCase [10] : test_adjust_tuple failed
>   + ------------------------------------------------------- +
>   + Test Suite Summary
>   + Tests Total :       11
>   + Tests Skipped :      0
>   + Tests Executed :    11
>   + Tests Unsupported:   0
>   + Tests Passed :      10
>   + Tests Failed :       1
>   + ------------------------------------------------------- +
> Test Failed
> RTE>>
> --- stderr ---
> EAL: Detected 2 lcore(s)
> EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes
> EAL: Detected shared linkage of DPDK
> EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/thash_autotest/mp_socket
> EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'PA'
> EAL: No available 1048576 kB hugepages reported
> EAL: VFIO support initialized
> APP: HPET is not enabled, using TSC as default timer
> HASH: Can't add helper  due to conflict with existing helper second_range
> HASH: Can't generate m-sequence due to period overflow
> EAL: Test assert test_adjust_tuple line 559 failed: can not adjust
> tuple, ret -17
> 
> -------
> 
> 
> 
>> +
>> +       for (i = 0; i < (TUPLE_SZ / 4); i++)
>> +               tmp_tuple[i] =
>> +                       rte_be_to_cpu_32(*(uint32_t *)&tuple[i * 4]);
>> +
>> +       hash = rte_softrss(tmp_tuple, TUPLE_SZ / 4, new_key);
>> +       RTE_TEST_ASSERT((hash & HASH_MSK(reta_sz)) ==
>> +               desired_value, "bad desired value\n");
>> +
>> +       rte_thash_free_ctx(ctx);
>> +
>> +       return TEST_SUCCESS;
>> +}
> 
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vladimir