[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bonding: fix overflow check

[Min Hu (Connor)]

在 2021/4/29 21:33, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 4/27/2021 2:40 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> Buffer 'test_params->slave_port_ids' of size 6 accessed may
>> overflow, since its index 'i' can have value be is out of range.
>>
>> This patch fixed it.
>>
>> Fixes: 92073ef961ee ("bond: unit tests")
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * fix bonded_slave_count value.
>> ---
>>   app/test/test_link_bonding.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
>> index 8a5c831..f8abb22 100644
>> --- a/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
>> +++ b/app/test/test_link_bonding.c
>> @@ -2216,6 +2216,9 @@ test_activebackup_rx_burst(void)
>>   			"failed to get primary slave for bonded port (%d)",
>>   			test_params->bonded_port_id);
>>   
>> +	if (test_params->bonded_slave_count > TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS)
>> +		test_params->bonded_slave_count = TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS;
>> +
> 
> Hi Connor,
> 
> Similar comment as previous version, what is the root cause, how
> 'bonded_slave_count' end up being bigger than 'TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS'?
> 
Hi Ferruh,
Currently, it will not happen.
But if the testcase extended, for instance,
"test_add_slave_to_bonded_device" is called over
TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS(6) times in
"test_add_already_bonded_slave_to_bonded_device",
then 'bonded_slave_count' will be bigger than
'TEST_MAX_NUMBER_OF_PORTS'.

>>   	for (i = 0; i < test_params->bonded_slave_count; i++) {
>>   		/* Generate test bursts of packets to transmit */
>>   		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(generate_test_burst(
>>
> 
> .
>