[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 v2 0/3] octeontx build only on 64-bit Linux

[Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula]

>On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thomas Monjalon
><thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>>
>> This is a reorg of the patches from Pavan.
>> It has been discussed that it should wait for DPDK 21.11
>> for ABI compatibility reason.
>>
>> Pavan Nikhilesh (3):
>>   net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
>>   common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
>>   common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux
>>
>>  drivers/common/octeontx/meson.build   |  6 ++++++
>>  drivers/common/octeontx2/meson.build  |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/compress/octeontx/meson.build |  6 ++++++
>>  drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build   |  7 +++++--
>>  drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build    |  6 ++++++
>>  drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build   |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/mempool/octeontx/meson.build  |  5 +++--
>>  drivers/mempool/octeontx2/meson.build |  9 ++-------
>>  drivers/net/octeontx/meson.build      |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/net/octeontx2/meson.build     | 10 ++--------
>>  drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build      |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/raw/octeontx2_dma/meson.build | 10 ++++++----
>>  12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
>There were a couple of cleanups (indent etc..) and changes in meson
>files.
>This series does not apply cleanly on the main branch.
>Could you rebase it?

Ack l will rebase it.

>
>I noticed that the net/cnxk driver does not have this check, but it is
>disabled anyway since it depends on common/cnxk.
>Is it worth adding the check for consistency?

Sure I will add checks to cnxk driver family.

Thanks,
Pavan.

>
>
>--
>David Marchand