[dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab

Brandon Lo blo at iol.unh.edu
Tue Feb 9 17:07:09 CET 2021


Hi everyone,

I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few pipelines to
make sure everything goes smoothly.

Thanks for the update,
Brandon

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki at intel.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Lincoln,
> >
> >
> >
> > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x.
> >
>
> Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few
> hours ago).  I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too?
>
> >
> > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if
> > this is what you are seeing on your end too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tomek
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM
> > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki at intel.com>
> > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>; Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab at iol.unh.edu; ci at dpdk.org;
> > dev at dpdk.org; spdk at lists.01.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks Tomek,
> >
> >
> >
> > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure
> > is. :-P
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lincoln
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Hi Aaron,
> >
> >  Thank you for reporting this !
> >
> >  This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK.
> >
> >  I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK
> >  release, would be v21.01.x:
> >  https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x
> >
> >  The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly:
> >  https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Tomek
> >
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
> >  > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM
> >  > To: Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>
> >  > Cc: dpdklab at iol.unh.edu; ci at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org; spdk at lists.01.org
> >  > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
> >  >
> >  > Greetings,
> >  >
> >  > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems
> >  > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure.
> >  > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't
> >  > available when linking.
> >  >
> >  > Job details (for example):
> >  > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results-
> >  > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20
> >  > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip
> >  >
> >  > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of
> >  > SPDK?  Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object?
> >  > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong?
> >  >
> >  > Thanks,
> >  > -Aaron
>


-- 

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu


More information about the dev mailing list