[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/8] use GCC's C11 atomic builtins for test

Stephen Hemminger stephen at networkplumber.org
Fri Jun 4 21:57:14 CEST 2021


On Fri,  4 Jun 2021 04:46:16 -0500
Joyce Kong <joyce.kong at arm.com> wrote:

> Since C11 memory model is adopted in DPDK now[1], use GCC's 
> atomic builtins in test cases.
> 
> [1]https://www.dpdk.org/blog/2021/03/26/dpdk-adopts-the-c11-memory-model/
> 
> Joyce Kong (8):
>   test/ticketlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
>   test/spinlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
>   test/rwlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
>   test/mcslock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
>   test/mempool: remove unused variable for lcores sync
>   test/mempool_perf: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
>   test/service_cores: use GCC atomic builtins for lock sync
>   test/rcu_perf: use GCC atomic builtins for data sync
> 
>  app/test/test_mcslock.c       | 13 +++--
>  app/test/test_mempool.c       |  5 --
>  app/test/test_mempool_perf.c  | 12 ++---
>  app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>  app/test/test_rwlock.c        |  9 ++--
>  app/test/test_service_cores.c | 36 +++++++------
>  app/test/test_spinlock.c      | 10 ++--
>  app/test/test_ticketlock.c    |  9 ++--
>  8 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, I did this for pflock tests during review cycle

Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>


More information about the dev mailing list