[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/8] use GCC's C11 atomic builtins for test
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Fri Jun 4 21:57:14 CEST 2021
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 04:46:16 -0500
Joyce Kong <joyce.kong at arm.com> wrote:
> Since C11 memory model is adopted in DPDK now[1], use GCC's
> atomic builtins in test cases.
>
> [1]https://www.dpdk.org/blog/2021/03/26/dpdk-adopts-the-c11-memory-model/
>
> Joyce Kong (8):
> test/ticketlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
> test/spinlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
> test/rwlock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
> test/mcslock: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
> test/mempool: remove unused variable for lcores sync
> test/mempool_perf: use GCC atomic builtins for lcores sync
> test/service_cores: use GCC atomic builtins for lock sync
> test/rcu_perf: use GCC atomic builtins for data sync
>
> app/test/test_mcslock.c | 13 +++--
> app/test/test_mempool.c | 5 --
> app/test/test_mempool_perf.c | 12 ++---
> app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> app/test/test_rwlock.c | 9 ++--
> app/test/test_service_cores.c | 36 +++++++------
> app/test/test_spinlock.c | 10 ++--
> app/test/test_ticketlock.c | 9 ++--
> 8 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>
Thanks, I did this for pflock tests during review cycle
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
More information about the dev
mailing list