[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/i40e: remove the SMP barrier in HW scanning func

[Honnappa Nagarahalli]

<snip>

> >
> > Add the logic to determine how many DD bits have been set for
> > contiguous packets, for removing the SMP barrier while reading descs.
> 
> I didn't understand this.
> The current logic already guarantee the read out DD bits are from continue
> packets, as it read Rx descriptor in a reversed order from the ring.
Qi, the comments in the code mention that there is a race condition if the descriptors are not read in the reverse order. But, they do not mention what the race condition is and how it can occur. Appreciate if you could explain that.

On x86, the reads are not re-ordered (though the compiler can re-order). On ARM, the reads can get re-ordered and hence the barriers are required. In order to avoid the barriers, we are trying to process only those descriptors whose DD bits are set such that they are contiguous. i.e. if the DD bits are 1011, we process only the first descriptor.

> So I didn't see the a new logic be added, would you describe more clear about
> the purpose of this patch?
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong at arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> > 6c58decec..410a81f30 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ i40e_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
> >  	uint16_t pkt_len;
> >  	uint64_t qword1;
> >  	uint32_t rx_status;
> > -	int32_t s[I40E_LOOK_AHEAD], nb_dd;
> > +	int32_t s[I40E_LOOK_AHEAD], var, nb_dd;
> >  	int32_t i, j, nb_rx = 0;
> >  	uint64_t pkt_flags;
> >  	uint32_t *ptype_tbl = rxq->vsi->adapter->ptype_tbl; @@ -482,11
> > +482,14 @@ i40e_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
> >  					I40E_RXD_QW1_STATUS_SHIFT;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		rte_smp_rmb();
> 
> Any performance gain by removing this? and it is not necessary to be
> combined with below change, right?
> 
> > -
> >  		/* Compute how many status bits were set */
> > -		for (j = 0, nb_dd = 0; j < I40E_LOOK_AHEAD; j++)
> > -			nb_dd += s[j] & (1 <<
> I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_DD_SHIFT);
> > +		for (j = 0, nb_dd = 0; j < I40E_LOOK_AHEAD; j++) {
> > +			var = s[j] & (1 << I40E_RX_DESC_STATUS_DD_SHIFT);
> > +			if (var)
> > +				nb_dd += 1;
> > +			else
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> >
> >  		nb_rx += nb_dd;
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1