[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/4] net/tap: fix Rx cksum flags on IP options packets
Andrew Rybchenko
andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru
Tue Jun 8 12:13:59 CEST 2021
On 4/30/21 5:48 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/27/2021 2:57 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>> When packet type is IPV4_EXT, the checksum is always marked as good in
>> the mbuf offload flags.
>>
>> Since we know the header lengths, we can easily call
>> rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum() in this case too.
>>
>> Fixes: 8ae3023387e9 ("net/tap: add Rx/Tx checksum offload support")
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>> index 68baa18523..e7b185a4b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ tap_verify_csum(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>> /* Don't verify checksum for multi-segment packets. */
>> if (mbuf->nb_segs > 1)
>> return;
>> - if (l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4) {
>> + if (l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 || l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT) {
>
> Should we take 'RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN' into account?
I think we should.
>
>> if (l4 == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) {
>> udp_hdr = (struct rte_udp_hdr *)l4_hdr;
>> if (udp_hdr->dgram_cksum == 0) {
>> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ tap_verify_csum(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>> }
>> }
>> cksum = ~rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
>> - } else if (l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6) {
>> + } else { /* l3 == RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6, checked above */
>> cksum = ~rte_ipv6_udptcp_cksum(l3_hdr, l4_hdr);
>> }
>> mbuf->ol_flags |= cksum ?
>>
More information about the dev
mailing list