[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: send failure logs to stderr

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Fri Jun 11 15:21:59 CEST 2021


On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:35:59AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/11/2021 10:19 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > On 6/11/21 5:06 AM, Li, Xiaoyun wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru> 
> >> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 00:25
> >> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: send failure logs to stderr
> >>
> >> Running with stdout suppressed or redirected for further processing is very confusing in the case of errors.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This patch looks good to me.
> >> But what do you think about make it as a fix and backport to stable branches?
> >> Anyway works for me.
> > 
> > I have no strong opinion on the topic.
> > 
> > @Ferruh, what do you think?
> > 
> 
> Same here, no strong opinion.
> Sending errors to 'stderr' looks correct thing to do, but changing behavior in
> the LTS may cause some unexpected side affect, if it is scripted and testpmd
> output is parsed etc... For this possibility I would wait for the next LTS.
> 
There are really 3 options, though:
* apply and backport
* apply now
* apply only to next LTS

I would tend to support the middle option, because sending errors to stderr
is the right thing to do as you say, and I don't think we need to wait for
next LTS to make the change. However, since we don't want to change
behaviour in the older LTS's, I'd suggest not backporting.

/Bruce


More information about the dev mailing list