[dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] config/arm: add Qualcomm Centriq 2400 part number

[Thierry Herbelot]

On 6/17/21 12:03 PM, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot at 6wind.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 4:16 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot at 6wind.com>; thomas at monjalon.net;
>> jerinj at marvell.com; Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang at arm.com>; Honnappa
>> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>; Juraj Linkeš
>> <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
>> Subject: [PATCH V3] config/arm: add Qualcomm Centriq 2400 part number
>>
>> 0xc00 is for "SoC 2.0" Qualcomm Centriq servers.
>> 0x800 is for "SoC 1.1".
>>
>> Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
>> Cc: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
>> Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
>> Cc: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot at 6wind.com>
>> --
>> V2: add maintainers as Cc
>> V3: fix meson syntax for the SoC v1.1 machine description
>> ---
>>   config/arm/meson.build | 12 ++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build index
>> e83a56e0d589..b33303d09023 100644
>> --- a/config/arm/meson.build
>> +++ b/config/arm/meson.build
>> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ implementer_qualcomm = {
>>           ['RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES', 1]
>>       ],
>>       'part_number_config': {
>> -        '0xc00': {'machine_args':  ['-march=armv8-a+crc']}
>> +        '0x800': {'machine_args':  ['-march=armv8-a+crc']},
>> +        '0xc00': {'machine_args':  ['-march=armv8-a+crc']},
>>       }
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -223,8 +224,15 @@ soc_bluefield = {
>>       'numa': false
>>   }
>>
>> +soc_centriq2400_v1_1 = {
>> +    'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400 (SoC v1.1)',
>> +    'implementer': '0x51',
>> +    'part_number': '0x800',
>> +    'numa': false
>> +}
>> +
> What is the difference between SoC v1.1 and SoC v2.0. Do they have different instruction levels or extensions?
> They have the same machine_args. I think the two part numbers can share the same soc_xx. Because cross built binary can run on both SoCs.
> What do you think?

Hello,

There is no visible differences between the two versions.

How do we merge the soc_centriq2400 configurations ?
It would seem it is only possible to have one part_number per soc 
configuration.

	Thierry

> 
> Thanks.
>>   soc_centriq2400 = {
>> -    'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400',
>> +    'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400 (SoC v2.0)',
>>       'implementer': '0x51',
>>       'part_number': '0xc00',
>>       'numa': false
>> --
>> 2.29.2
> 

-- 
Thierry Herbelot
Senior Software Engineer
Tel: +33 1 39 30 92 61
http://www.6wind.com/

Follow us:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/6wind/
https://twitter.com/6WINDsoftware
https://www.youtube.com/user/6windsoftware