[dpdk-dev] Question about bonding port promiscuous
Min Hu (Connor)
humin29 at huawei.com
Thu Oct 21 15:39:46 CEST 2021
Hi, David,
how about your opinion ?
在 2021/10/21 20:58, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
> Hi, Ferruh, Thomas,
> any comments?
>
> 在 2021/10/19 19:52, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>> Hi, anyone could give me a reply? thanks.
>>
>> 在 2021/10/14 10:13, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
>>> Hi, Declan Doherty,
>>> In function "bond_ethdev_promiscuous_disable",
>>> for "ROUND ROBIN","BALANCE","BROADCAST","8023AD" mode, Promiscuous mode
>>> is propagated to all slaves.
>>>
>>> While for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", "TLB", "ALB", promiscuous mode is
>>> propagated only to primary slave.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> The second question, for "ACTIVE_BACKUP", when primary active slave
>>> fails, a different slave becomes active, does the promiscuous mode state
>>> of former primary should be set to the new primary?
>>>
>>> Hope for your reply.
>>> Best Wishes.
>>> .
>> .
> .
More information about the dev
mailing list