[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: add command to print representor info

[Andrew Rybchenko]

On 9/14/21 6:52 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 8/31/2021 5:12 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> From: Viacheslav Galaktionov <viacheslav.galaktionov at oktetlabs.ru>
>>
>> Make it simpler to debug configurations and code related to the representor
>> info API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Galaktionov <viacheslav.galaktionov at oktetlabs.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amoreton at xilinx.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>>     - change output format to log just one line per range
>>
>>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 135 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> index 82253bc751..ae700f9dd1 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>  			"    Show port supported ptypes"
>>  			" for a specific port\n\n"
>>  
>> +			"show port (port_id) representor info\n"
>> +			"    Show supported representors"
>> +			" for a specific port\n\n"
>> +
> 
> What do you think extending existing "show port info #" command instead of
> creating a new command for it?

My fear with such approach is that output of the "show port
info #" is already too long and adding representors info
there will make it even much longer.

> Since "show port info #" is a well known command, it can simplify the usage.
> When port is representor port it can display additional info.
> 

Just to be clear: it will output information for "backer"
(or parent) port which should be used to create representors.