[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: add ability to reduce the Rx latency

Zhang, AlvinX alvinx.zhang at intel.com
Wed Sep 22 04:16:20 CEST 2021


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 5:21 PM
> To: Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: add ability to reduce the Rx latency
> 
> On 18/09/2021 02:33, Zhang, AlvinX wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 1:25 AM
> >> To: Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> >> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo at intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: add ability to reduce the Rx
> >> latency
> >>
> >> On 14/09/2021 02:31, Alvin Zhang wrote:
> >>> This patch adds a devarg parameter to enable/disable reducing the Rx
> >>> latency.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   doc/guides/nics/ice.rst      |  8 ++++++++
> >>>   drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>> drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h |  1 +
> >>>   3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst index
> >>> 5bc472f..3db0430 100644
> >>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
> >>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
> >>> @@ -219,6 +219,14 @@ Runtime Config Options
> >>>
> >>>     These ICE_DBG_XXX are defined in
> ``drivers/net/ice/base/ice_type.h``.
> >>>
> >>> +- ``Reduce Rx interrupts and latency`` (default ``0``)
> >>> +
> >>> +  vRAN workloads require low latency DPDK interface for the front
> >>> + haul  interface connection to Radio. Now we can reduce Rx
> >>> + interrupts and  latency by specify ``1`` for parameter ``rx-low-latency``::
> >>> +
> >>> +    -a 0000:88:00.0,rx-low-latency=1
> >>> +
> >>
> >> When would a user select this and when not? What is the trade off?
> >>
> >> The text is a bit unclear. It looks below like it reduces the
> >> interrupt latency, but not the number of interrupts. Maybe I got it wrong.
> >
> > Yes, it reduces the interrupt latency, We will refine the doc in next
> > patch.
> >
> 
> Thanks, the text in v2 is clearer.
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>>   Driver compilation and testing
> >>>   ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> >>> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c index a4cd39c..85662e4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> >>> @@ -29,12 +29,14 @@
> >>>   #define ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG
> "pipeline-mode-support"
> >>>   #define ICE_PROTO_XTR_ARG         "proto_xtr"
> >>>   #define ICE_HW_DEBUG_MASK_ARG     "hw_debug_mask"
> >>> +#define ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY        "rx-low-latency"
> >>>
> >>>   static const char * const ice_valid_args[] = {
> >>>   	ICE_SAFE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG,
> >>>   	ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG,
> >>>   	ICE_PROTO_XTR_ARG,
> >>>   	ICE_HW_DEBUG_MASK_ARG,
> >>> +	ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY,
> >>>   	NULL
> >>>   };
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1827,6 +1829,9 @@ static int ice_parse_devargs(struct
> >>> rte_eth_dev
> >> *dev)
> >>>   	if (ret)
> >>>   		goto bail;
> >>>
> >>> +	ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY,
> >>> +				 &parse_bool, &ad->devargs.rx_low_latency);
> >>> +
> >>>   bail:
> >>>   	rte_kvargs_free(kvlist);
> >>>   	return ret;
> >>> @@ -3144,8 +3149,9 @@ static int ice_init_rss(struct ice_pf *pf)  {
> >>>   	struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_VSI_TO_HW(vsi);
> >>>   	uint32_t val, val_tx;
> >>> -	int i;
> >>> +	int rx_low_latency, i;
> >>>
> >>> +	rx_low_latency = vsi->adapter->devargs.rx_low_latency;
> >>>   	for (i = 0; i < nb_queue; i++) {
> >>>   		/*do actual bind*/
> >>>   		val = (msix_vect & QINT_RQCTL_MSIX_INDX_M) | @@ -3155,8
> >> +3161,21 @@
> >>> static int ice_init_rss(struct ice_pf *pf)
> >>>
> >>>   		PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "queue %d is binding to vect %d",
> >>>   			    base_queue + i, msix_vect);
> >>> +
> >>>   		/* set ITR0 value */
> >>> -		ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, GLINT_ITR(0, msix_vect), 0x2);
> >>> +		if (rx_low_latency) {
> >>> +			/**
> >>> +			 * Empirical configuration for optimal real time
> >>> +			 * latency reduced interrupt throttling to 2us
> >>> +			 */
> >>> +			ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, GLINT_ITR(0, msix_vect), 0x1);
> >>
> >> Why not set this to 0? "Setting the INTERVAL to zero enables
> >> immediate interrupt."
> >>
> 
> Didn't see a reply to this comment?
> 
> I'm not requesting a change, just asking if there is a reason you didn't choose the
> lowest latency setting, and if you should?

Setting the INTERVAL to zero enable immediate interrupt, which will cause more interrupts at high packets rates, 
and more interrupts will consume more PCI bandwidth and CPU cycles.
Setting to 2us is a performance trade-off.
> 
> >>> +			ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QRX_ITR(base_queue + i),
> >>> +				      QRX_ITR_NO_EXPR_M);
> >>> +		} else {
> >>> +			ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, GLINT_ITR(0, msix_vect), 0x2);
> >>> +			ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QRX_ITR(base_queue + i), 0);
> >>> +		}
> >>> +
> >>>   		ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QINT_RQCTL(base_queue + i), val);
> >>>   		ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QINT_TQCTL(base_queue + i), val_tx);
> >>>   	}
> >>> @@ -5314,7 +5333,8 @@ static int ice_xstats_get_names(__rte_unused
> >> struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >>>   			      ICE_HW_DEBUG_MASK_ARG "=0xXXX"
> >>>   			      ICE_PROTO_XTR_ARG
> >> "=[queue:]<vlan|ipv4|ipv6|ipv6_flow|tcp|ip_offset>"
> >>>   			      ICE_SAFE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG "=<0|1>"
> >>> -			      ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG "=<0|1>");
> >>> +			      ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG "=<0|1>"
> >>> +			      ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY "=<0|1>");
> >>>
> >>>   RTE_LOG_REGISTER_SUFFIX(ice_logtype_init, init, NOTICE);
> >>> RTE_LOG_REGISTER_SUFFIX(ice_logtype_driver, driver, NOTICE); diff
> >>> --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> >>> index b4bf651..c61cc1f 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
> >>> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ struct ice_pf {
> >>>    * Cache devargs parse result.
> >>>    */
> >>>   struct ice_devargs {
> >>> +	int rx_low_latency;
> >>>   	int safe_mode_support;
> >>>   	uint8_t proto_xtr_dflt;
> >>>   	int pipe_mode_support;
> >>>
> >



More information about the dev mailing list