[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] flow_classify: remove eperimental tag from the API

[Iremonger, Bernard]

Hi Kevin,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 3:48 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>; Kinsella, Ray
> <ray.kinsella at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] flow_classify: remove eperimental tag from
> the API
> 
> s/eperimental/experimental/
> 
> On 15/09/2021 16:16, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > This API was introduced in 17.11, removing experimental tag to promote
> > to stable state.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h | 7 -------
> >   lib/flow_classify/version.map         | 2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> The library is still listed as experimental
> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h#n13
> 
> and you can remove the allow_experimental_apis from the example app
> now.

Good catch.
I will remove allow_experimental_apis  from the flow_classify/meson.build file.

 
> > diff --git a/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> > b/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> > index 82ea92b6a6..3759cd32af 100644
> > --- a/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> > +++ b/lib/flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h
> > @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ struct rte_flow_classify_ipv4_5tuple_stats {
> >    * @return
> >    *   Handle to flow classifier instance on success or NULL otherwise
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   struct rte_flow_classifier *
> >   rte_flow_classifier_create(struct rte_flow_classifier_params
> > *params);
> >
> > @@ -169,7 +168,6 @@ rte_flow_classifier_create(struct
> rte_flow_classifier_params *params);
> >    * @return
> >    *   0 on success, error code otherwise
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_classifier_free(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls);
> >
> > @@ -183,7 +181,6 @@ rte_flow_classifier_free(struct rte_flow_classifier
> *cls);
> >    * @return
> >    *   0 on success, error code otherwise
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_classify_table_create(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >   		struct rte_flow_classify_table_params *params); @@ -205,7
> +202,6
> > @@ rte_flow_classify_table_create(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >    * @return
> >    *   0 on success, error code otherwise
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_classify_validate(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >   		const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> > @@ -232,7 +228,6 @@ rte_flow_classify_validate(struct rte_flow_classifier
> *cls,
> >    * @return
> >    *   A valid handle in case of success, NULL otherwise.
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   struct rte_flow_classify_rule *
> >   rte_flow_classify_table_entry_add(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >   		const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
> > @@ -251,7 +246,6 @@ rte_flow_classify_table_entry_add(struct
> rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >    * @return
> >    *   0 on success, error code otherwise.
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_classify_table_entry_delete(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >   		struct rte_flow_classify_rule *rule); @@ -273,7 +267,6 @@
> > rte_flow_classify_table_entry_delete(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >    * @return
> >    *   0 on success, error code otherwise.
> >    */
> > -__rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_classifier_query(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
> >   		struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > diff --git a/lib/flow_classify/version.map
> > b/lib/flow_classify/version.map index 49bc25c6a0..b7a888053b 100644
> > --- a/lib/flow_classify/version.map
> > +++ b/lib/flow_classify/version.map
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -EXPERIMENTAL {
> > +DPDK_22 {
> >   	global:
> >
> >   	rte_flow_classifier_create;
> >

Regards,

Bernard.