[PATCH V5 0/7] app/testpmd: fix RSS and flow type

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at xilinx.com
Tue Jun 28 15:18:18 CEST 2022


On 6/25/2022 2:09 AM, lihuisong (C) wrote:
> 
> 在 2022/6/24 18:44, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
>> On 6/24/2022 10:54 AM, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>>> CAUTION: This message has originated from an External Source. Please
>>> use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking
>>> links, or responding to this email.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> 在 2022/6/24 16:59, David Marchand 写道:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:55 AM lihuisong (C)
>>>> <lihuisong at huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Ferruh,
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset has been sent. However, a merge conflict is displayed on
>>>>> the CI.
>>>>> In fact, I'm do it based on the latest mainline, and there are nothing
>>>>> conflict.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you help me re-trigger the build?
>>>> There may be different reasons why (likely on your side), but
>>>> patchwork does not see the patches you sent as a single series.
>>>> For example, patch 4 is seen as part of the v2 series.
>>>>
>>>> The CI tools rely on patchwork.
>>>> So the various CI won't be able to apply them.
>>>>
>>>> Please resend.
>>> Thanks. It's the patchwork problem. This patchset are assigned to two
>>> series.
>>> As shown in the link below:
>>> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=&submitter=2085&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I resend, but this patchset hasn't changed.
>>> Do I need to change the version number of this patchset?
>>
>> Hi Huisong,
>>
>> I think both are OK, but just to clarify which one is latest, I think
>> there is no harm to increase the version.
> Get it. V6 will be sent.

Thank you.




More information about the dev mailing list