[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/bnxt: fix ver get HWRM command

[Ajit Khaparde]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:11 AM David Marchand
<david.marchand at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Kalesh, Ajit,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 1:53 PM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:45 AM Kalesh A P
> > <kalesh-anakkur.purayil at broadcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil at broadcom.com>
> > >
> > > Fix HWRM_VER_GET command to handle DEV_NOT_RDY state.
> > >
> > > Driver should fail probe if the device is not ready.
> > > Conversely, the HWRM_VER_GET poll after reset can safely
> > > retry until the existing timeout is exceeded.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 804e746c7b73 ("net/bnxt: add hardware resource manager init code")
> > > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil at broadcom.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur at broadcom.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Randy Schacher <stuart.schacher at broadcom.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ajit Kumar Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
> >
> > This patch makes probing fail on a RHEL9 kernel with firmwares:
> > firmware-version: 20.6.143.0/pkg 20.06.04.06
> > and
> > firmware-version: 20.6.112.0
Oh wow! That's really old FW.

> >
> > Simply reverting the patch fixes probing in my env.
> >
> > This was reported by our QE team which is doing sanity checks on ovs
> > 2.17 which uses dpdk v21.11.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055531
>
> QE confirmed reverting this patch fixed initialisation in their setup.
> I reproduced the issue on another system with RHEL 8.5, and confirmed
> that reverting the patch or upgrading the firmware fix the issue.
>
> I can understand new features in a PMD might require newer firmwares.
> But breaking compatibility with older firmwares is a big no.
I agree.
Ideally this should not have been sent as a fix targeting the super-old commit
804e746c7b73.

>
> If there is no other option, I will send a revert for this patch.
A version check may help avoid a complete revert.
But that will require some testing, which means we are looking at
mid-next week for the fix.

Submit the revert patch, just in case it takes longer than that.

Thanks
Ajit


>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4218 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20220317/8a1570c2/attachment.bin>