[PATCH v3] test/service: fix spurious failures by extending timeout
Harry van Haaren
harry.van.haaren at intel.com
Thu Oct 6 14:52:47 CEST 2022
This commit extends the timeout for service_may_be_active()
from 100ms to 1000ms. Local testing on a idle and loaded system
(compiling DPDK with all cores) always completes after 1 ms.
The wait time for a service-lcore to finish is also extended
from 100ms to 1000ms.
The same timeout waiting code was duplicated in two tests, and
is now refactored to a standalone function avoiding duplication.
Reported-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Mattias Ronnblom <mattias.ronnblom at ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
---
v3:
- Use #define for timeout, and delay(1) (Mattias)
- Rework slcore-wait to use TIMEOUT_MS as well.
v2:
- v1 addressed only testcase 15 issue, v2 also addresses test
case 5, which has an service-lcore wait code-path.
---
app/test/test_service_cores.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_service_cores.c b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
index 359b6dcd8b..637fcd7cf9 100644
--- a/app/test/test_service_cores.c
+++ b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static uint64_t service_tick;
static uint32_t service_remote_launch_flag;
#define SERVICE_DELAY 1
+#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000
#define DUMMY_SERVICE_NAME "dummy_service"
#define MT_SAFE_SERVICE_NAME "mt_safe_service"
@@ -123,15 +124,15 @@ unregister_all(void)
return TEST_SUCCESS;
}
-/* Wait until service lcore not active, or for 100x SERVICE_DELAY */
+/* Wait until service lcore not active, or for TIMEOUT_MS */
static void
wait_slcore_inactive(uint32_t slcore_id)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; rte_service_lcore_may_be_active(slcore_id) == 1 &&
- i < 100; i++)
- rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
+ i < TIMEOUT_MS; i++)
+ rte_delay_ms(1);
}
/* register a single dummy service */
@@ -921,12 +922,25 @@ service_lcore_start_stop(void)
return unregister_all();
}
+static int
+service_ensure_stopped_with_timeout(uint32_t sid)
+{
+ /* give the service time to stop running */
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < TIMEOUT_MS; i++) {
+ if (!rte_service_may_be_active(sid))
+ break;
+ rte_delay_ms(1);
+ }
+
+ return rte_service_may_be_active(sid);
+}
+
/* stop a service and wait for it to become inactive */
static int
service_may_be_active(void)
{
const uint32_t sid = 0;
- int i;
/* expected failure cases */
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(-EINVAL, rte_service_may_be_active(10000),
@@ -946,19 +960,11 @@ service_may_be_active(void)
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(1, service_lcore_running_check(),
"Service core expected to poll service but it didn't");
- /* stop the service */
+ /* stop the service, and wait for not-active with timeout */
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_runstate_set(sid, 0),
"Error: Service stop returned non-zero");
-
- /* give the service 100ms to stop running */
- for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- if (!rte_service_may_be_active(sid))
- break;
- rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
- }
-
- TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_may_be_active(sid),
- "Error: Service not stopped after 100ms");
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, service_ensure_stopped_with_timeout(sid),
+ "Error: Service not stopped after timeout period.");
return unregister_all();
}
@@ -972,7 +978,6 @@ service_active_two_cores(void)
return TEST_SKIPPED;
const uint32_t sid = 0;
- int i;
uint32_t lcore = rte_get_next_lcore(/* start core */ -1,
/* skip main */ 1,
@@ -1002,16 +1007,8 @@ service_active_two_cores(void)
/* stop the service */
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_runstate_set(sid, 0),
"Error: Service stop returned non-zero");
-
- /* give the service 100ms to stop running */
- for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
- if (!rte_service_may_be_active(sid))
- break;
- rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
- }
-
- TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_may_be_active(sid),
- "Error: Service not stopped after 100ms");
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, service_ensure_stopped_with_timeout(sid),
+ "Error: Service not stopped after timeout period.");
return unregister_all();
}
--
2.34.1
More information about the dev
mailing list