[PATCH v1 1/2] dts: fabric requirements

[Juraj Linkeš]

On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:18 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:

> 03/04/2023 16:56, Juraj Linkeš:
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 2:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > 03/04/2023 13:46, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > > Replace pexpect with Fabric.
> > >
> > > You should squash these lines with the move to Fabric.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
> > > > ---
> > > >  dts/poetry.lock    | 553
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > >
> > > Do we really need *all* these lines?
> > > I see a lot of lines about Windows and MacOSX which are not supported
> in
> > > DTS.
> > > It is so long that it looks impossible to review.
> > >
> > >
> > This is a generated file and doesn't need to be reviewed.
>
> In general, I don't like storing generated files.
>

Me neither, but this one is specifically designed to be stored in a
repository:
https://python-poetry.org/docs/basic-usage/#commit-your-poetrylock-file-to-version-control


>
> > I separated the
> > dependencies part so that the code part is easier to review. If you
> want, I
> > can squash the two commits.
>
> What happens if we manually remove the useless lines?
>
>
The lock file is there so that everyone installs exactly the same versions
of dependencies. We can specify the versions of dependencies in
pyproject.toml, but we won't control the versions of dependencies of
dependencies this way. If we remove the changes to the lock file, then we
won't be storing tested versions, everyone would be using slightly
different versions and we may potentially need to address versioning issues
in the future - best to prevent that with a lock file.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20230404/20942e87/attachment.htm>