[PATCH v2] doc: build manpages as well as html output

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Thu Aug 3 18:43:33 CEST 2023


On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:18:09AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 1:09 PM Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> > > There may be some polishing to do later.
> > > Looking at the result for rte_eal_init, I see that the generated
> > > manual starts with a reference to the rte_eal.h header with a path
> > > relative to its location in the DPDK tree.
> > > $ MANPATH=build-gcc/install/share/man man rte_eal_init | head -5
> > > lib/eal/include/rte_eal.h(3)
> > >                                            DPDK
> > >
> > > lib/eal/include/rte_eal.h(3)
> > >
> > > NAME
> > >        lib/eal/include/rte_eal.h
> > >
> > > At least, it is possible to ask for this header man with "man
> > > rte_eal.h", but it is a bit confusing.
> > > Is there something we can do on this side?
> > >
> >
> > Not sure, not really familiar with how doxygen works generating manpages
> > and the options supported, etc. etc. Mainly I just looked at the
> > build-system side to support this, since I really missed having manpages
> > for DPDK functions to quickly check parameter order.
> 
> doxygen is invoked on the sources tree, so this is probably the reason
> why such path is in the generated manual.
> Maybe Thomas has an idea how we could handle this.
> 
> In any case, I am fine with this patch as it is now.
>
I think I've found a fix for this.
doxygen setting "FULL_PATH_NAMES" defaults to "YES", which is what we want
for the HTML pages. However, setting it to "NO", I believe is correct for
generating the manpages.

Patch V3 on its way.

/Bruce 


More information about the dev mailing list