[PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports

[Jiawei(Jonny) Wang]

Hi Andrew,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 8:57 PM
> To: Jiawei(Jonny) Wang <jiaweiw at nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika at nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-
> Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas at monjalon.net>;
> ferruh.yigit at amd.com; Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>; Yuying
> Zhang <yuying.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add Tx queue mapping of aggregated ports
> 
[snip]
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -6946,6 +6946,78 @@
> rte_eth_buffer_split_get_supported_hdr_ptypes(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t
> *ptypes
> >   	return j;
> >   }
> >
> > +int rte_eth_dev_count_aggr_ports(uint16_t port_id) {
> > +	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
> > +	dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> > +
> > +	if (*dev->dev_ops->count_aggr_ports == NULL)
> 
> Is it OK that tracing is long in this case?
> 

Do you mean that we don't need tracing in this case?

> > +		return 0;
> > +	ret = eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->count_aggr_ports)(port_id));
> > +
> > +	rte_eth_trace_count_aggr_ports(port_id, ret);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> [snip]