[PATCH v1 02/13] test/bbdev: refactor TB throughput report
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Tue Jan 31 10:48:26 CET 2023
On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Refactor calculation for tb_size.
> No functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> ---
> app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index cc7b5481d6..1a8a6b9f82 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -2613,18 +2613,15 @@ calc_enc_TB_size(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op)
> static uint32_t
> calc_ldpc_enc_TB_size(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op)
> {
> - uint8_t i;
> - uint32_t c, r, tb_size = 0;
> + uint32_t tb_size = 0;
> uint16_t sys_cols = (op->ldpc_enc.basegraph == 1) ? 22 : 10;
>
> if (op->ldpc_enc.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_CODE_BLOCK) {
> tb_size = sys_cols * op->ldpc_enc.z_c - op->ldpc_enc.n_filler;
> } else {
> - c = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.c;
> - r = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.r;
> - for (i = 0; i < c-r; i++)
> - tb_size += sys_cols * op->ldpc_enc.z_c
> - - op->ldpc_enc.n_filler;
> + tb_size = (sys_cols * op->ldpc_enc.z_c - op->ldpc_enc.n_filler)
> + * (op->ldpc_enc.tb_params.c -
> + op->ldpc_enc.tb_params.r);
It could be made simpler.
static uint32_t
calc_ldpc_dec_TB_size(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op)
{
uint8_t i;
uint32_t tb_size = 0;
uint16_t sys_cols = (op->ldpc_dec.basegraph == 1) ? 22 : 10;
if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_CODE_BLOCK)
i = 1
else
i = op->ldpc_dec.tb_params.c - op->ldpc_dec.tb_params.r;
tb_size = (sys_cols * op->ldpc_dec.z_c - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler) * i;
return tb_size;
}
What do you think?
Thanks,
Maxime
> }
> return tb_size;
> }
More information about the dev
mailing list