[PATCH v1 12/13] test/bbdev: remove check for invalid opaque data

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Assert also if the opaque date is invalid.

data*

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 8 +++-----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index 0930786fda..81bf2c8b60 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@
>   
>   #define SYNC_WAIT 0
>   #define SYNC_START 1
> -#define INVALID_OPAQUE -1
>   
>   #define INVALID_QUEUE_ID -1
>   /* Increment for next code block in external HARQ memory */
> @@ -1998,10 +1997,9 @@ check_enc_status_and_ordering(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
>   			"op_status (%d) != expected_status (%d)",
>   			op->status, expected_status);
>   
> -	if (op->opaque_data != (void *)(uintptr_t)INVALID_OPAQUE)
> -		TEST_ASSERT((void *)(uintptr_t)order_idx == op->opaque_data,
> -				"Ordering error, expected %p, got %p",
> -				(void *)(uintptr_t)order_idx, op->opaque_data);
> +	TEST_ASSERT((void *)(uintptr_t)order_idx == op->opaque_data,
> +			"Ordering error, expected %p, got %p",
> +			(void *)(uintptr_t)order_idx, op->opaque_data);
>   
>   	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>   }

It is a fix, isn't it?

Maxime