[PATCH] net/gve: fix bug in verify driver compatibility

[Rushil Gupta]

Thanks for the quick response!
Just for my own knowledge, what Junfeng described is the process to
fix the bug if a bug is present in the main dpdk repo?

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 3:24 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/2023 9:26 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 6/1/2023 5:49 AM, Rushil Gupta wrote:
> >> gVNIC requires physical address to be passed in the adminq command.
> >> This was initially rightly pointed by ferruh.yigit at .
> >> Fixed by passing 'driver_info_mem->iova'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta <rushilg at google.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
> >> index 2c1e73d07a..aa75abe102 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
> >> @@ -276,7 +276,8 @@ gve_verify_driver_compatibility(struct gve_priv *priv)
> >>                      (char *)driver_info->os_version_str2);
> >>
> >>      err = gve_adminq_verify_driver_compatibility(priv,
> >> -            sizeof(struct gve_driver_info), (dma_addr_t)driver_info);
> >> +            sizeof(struct gve_driver_info),
> >> +            (dma_addr_t)driver_info_mem->iova);
> >>
> >
> > Yep, this was my point, let me squashed onto original patch in next-net.
> >
> >
>
> Squashed into relevant commit in next-net, thanks.
> Can you please verify latest code in next-net?