[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/8] gro: support TCP/IPv6 and UDP/IPv6 for VLAN and VXLAN

Stephen Hemminger stephen at networkplumber.org
Mon Jun 12 04:11:29 CEST 2023


On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:53:28 +0000
"Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu at intel.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2021 4:49 PM
> > To: yang_y_yi at 163.com; Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>;
> > yangyi01 at inspur.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/8] gro: support TCP/IPv6 and UDP/IPv6
> > for VLAN and VXLAN
> > 
> > 24/03/2021 22:22, Thomas Monjalon:  
> > > 21/12/2020 04:50, yang_y_yi at 163.com:  
> > > > Yi Yang (8):
> > > >   gro: support TCP/IPv6
> > > >   gro: support IPv4 VXLAN TCP/IPv6
> > > >   gro: support IPv6 VXLAN TCP/IPv4
> > > >   gro: support IPv6 VXLAN TCP/IPv6
> > > >   gro: support UDP/IPv6
> > > >   gro: support IPv4 VXLAN UDP/IPv6
> > > >   gro: support IPv6 VXLAN UDP/IPv4
> > > >   gro: support IPv6 VXLAN UDP/IPv6  
> > >
> > > There was no review/activity on this thread.
> > > Is it abandoned?  
> > 
> > No reply. Should I assume it can be dropped?  
> 
> No further updates from Yi on this patch set. So I guess "yes"?

Ok, patch marked rejected.
If there is a use case, then a new maintainer can find it in archive
and work on it.

What was missing was a clear use case, documentation and testing.


More information about the dev mailing list