[dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC V2 0/2] TCP flow classification using 4-tuple and flags

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:05:28 +0000
Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini05 at gmail.com> wrote:

> V2 updates: checkpatch fixes, revert accidently spelling error
> introduced in V1;
> 
> The problem space of TCP flow tracking and classification
> based on TCP state requires the ability to classify TCP
> flows on more packet properties than just the 4-tuple,
> e.g., TCP flags. This patch-set investigates the set of
> changes needed in the examples/flow_classify.c needed to
> achieve this.
> 
> Patch 1 extends examples/flow_classify.c to allow constraints
> on tcp flags. Patch 2 extends the ACL handling in  
> librte_flow_classify to include keys on the properties in 
> addition to the tcp 4-tuple.
> 
> Note that one particular part of this patch-set where feedback
> is requested is in allocate_acl_ipv4_tcp_5tuple_rule():
> we need to add a key for the 8 bit flags, but the multibit
> trie lookup moves in steps of 4 bytes, so it took some hackery
> to figure out what byte-ordering was expected, and there were
> no documentation/examples to provide guidelines. Comments/suggestions
> would be particularly helpful.
> 
> Sowmini Varadhan (2):
>   Hooks to allow the setting of filters on tcp flags
>   Allow the flow_classify example to add an ACL table for tcp.
> 
>  examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c        | 121 +++++++++++++++---
>  examples/flow_classify/ipv4_rules_file.txt    |  22 ++--
>  lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.c  |  87 +++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.h  |  19 +++
>  .../rte_flow_classify_parse.c                 |   8 +-
>  5 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 

Is anyone still interested in this patch?
It would need work for DPDK 23.08 or later code base.
For now, marking it as "Changes Requested"