[PATCH v2 0/7] expand list of optional libraries

[David Marchand]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:13 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>
> DPDK still has many libraries which cannot be disabled as part of a
> build. With the ongoing work to make it easier to only build a subset
> of the libraries in DPDK, we can also work to expand the list of
> libraries which can be enabled/disabled as desired.
>
> This patch addresses a number of the "low-hanging fruit" libraries,
> where only the unit test builds need minor changes to support
> making the library optional. The rest of the build system is already
> well set up for selective disabling of libraries.
>
> For better support of enabling components, especially those more
> integrated into DPDK unit tests, rework of the test meson.build file
> is likely needed. For example, it could probably be better rewritten
> to use a dictionary of files and the dependencies of each file, and
> the unit test commands each provides. However, such rework is a
> significant effort, and outside the scope of this patchset.
>
> V2: fix checkpatch issues, since checkpatch doesn't like empty commit
>     messages (even if the title is pretty self-explanatory!)
>
> Bruce Richardson (7):
>   build: make most device classes optional
>   build: make membership library optional
>   build: make bpf library optional
>   build: make efd library optional
>   build: make distributor library optional
>   build: make fragmentation library optional
>   build: make reorder library optional
>
>  app/test/meson.build | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  lib/meson.build      | 13 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

There is a trivial conflict on the main repo (after lib/graph change),
so the CI did not run this v2 revision.

The v1 looked fine but there was a strange error in Intel report:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2023-June/415672.html

Could you rebase please?


-- 
David Marchand