[PATCH v10] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf application

[Jiang, Cheng1]

Hi Thomas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 5:09 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu at intel.com>; Wang, YuanX <yuanx.wang at intel.com>;
> Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang at intel.com>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>;
> mb at smartsharesystems.com; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>;
> amitprakashs at marvell.com; anoobj at marvell.com;
> huangdengdui at huawei.com; Laatz, Kevin <kevin.laatz at intel.com>;
> fengchengwen at huawei.com; jerinj at marvell.com; dev at dpdk.org; Ding,
> Xuan <xuan.ding at intel.com>; Ma, WenwuX <wenwux.ma at intel.com>; He,
> Xingguang <xingguang.he at intel.com>; Ling, WeiX <weix.ling at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf application
> 
> 28/06/2023 03:20, Cheng Jiang:
> > There are many high-performance DMA devices supported in DPDK now,
> and
> > these DMA devices can also be integrated into other modules of DPDK as
> > accelerators, such as Vhost. Before integrating DMA into applications,
> > developers need to know the performance of these DMA devices in
> > various scenarios and the performance of CPUs in the same scenario,
> > such as different buffer lengths. Only in this way can we know the
> > target performance of the application accelerated by using them. This
> > patch introduces a high-performance testing tool, which supports
> > comparing the performance of CPU and DMA in different scenarios
> > automatically with a pre-set config file. Memory Copy performance test are
> supported for now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <cheng1.jiang at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiayu Hu <jiayu.hu at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <yuanx.wang at intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>
> > Acked-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia at intel.com>
> 
> Who is going to be the maintainer for this new app?
> An entry in the file MAINTAINERS would be perfect.
> 

I can be the maintainer for this new app. Okay, I will add an entry to the MAINTAINERS file.
Would you prefer I send a new version patch to add this entry, or send a separate patch?

Thanks,
Cheng

>