[PATCH] app/testpmd: fix closing softnic port before ethdev ports

Dumitrescu, Cristian cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com
Fri Mar 10 14:45:30 CET 2023



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 9:09 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> Cc: Jangra, Yogesh <yogesh.jangra at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; R,
> Kamalakannan <kamalakannan.r at intel.com>; Suresh Narayane, Harshad
> <harshad.suresh.narayane at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix closing softnic port before ethdev ports
> 
> 
> On 3/10/2023 1:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:19:59 +0000
> > "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 4:31 PM
> >>> To: Jangra, Yogesh <yogesh.jangra at intel.com>
> >>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>;
> R,
> >>> Kamalakannan <kamalakannan.r at intel.com>; Suresh Narayane, Harshad
> >>> <harshad.suresh.narayane at intel.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix closing softnic port before ethdev
> ports
> >>>
> >>> On Thu,  9 Mar 2023 14:42:49 +0000
> >>> Yogesh Jangra <yogesh.jangra at intel.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +		/*
> >>>> +		 * SoftNIC runs on the sevice core, it uses the resources from
> >>>> +		 * the testpmd application. When we run quit command, the
> >>> testpmd
> >>>> +		 * application stops ethdev ports first, SoftNIC will try to
> >>>> +		 * access the port and sometimes that result in segmentation
> >>>> +		 * error. So first closing the SoftNIC port.
> >>>> +		 */
> >>>> +		RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(pt_id) {
> >>>> +			if (!strcmp(ports[pt_id].dev_info.driver_name,
> >>> "net_softnic")) {
> >>>> +				stop_port(pt_id);
> >>>> +				close_port(pt_id);
> >>>> +			}
> >>>> +		}
> >>>> +
> >>> NAK
> >>> No driver specific hacks please.
> >>>
> >>> Instead fix the driver design or bug please.
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> This is not a Soft NIC driver-specific hack, this is required for working around
> some of the ethdev drivers that don't implement the stop() API correctly and
> free up the device queues or some other internal resources on stop() instead of
> close().
> >>
> >> The Soft NIC is a meta-device that sits on top of other "physical" ethdev
> devices, so when the Soft NIC device continues to poll the queues of those
> physical devices after their queues have been freed, the Soft NIC will get a
> segfault. This fix is required to protect against this sort of incorrect driver
> behavior by simply stopping the Soft NIC devices first.
> >>
> >> We already have several driver specific branches in the test-pmd for e.g. LAG
> or virtual devices; IMO this small change falls in the same category and it should
> get accepted.
> >>
> >> Please let us know if this makes sense to you?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Cristian
> > If the application has to do this then something is wrong with the architecture.
> >
> >
> > You aren't propagating state changes through in a safe manner.
> > Other applications will have same issue.
> >
> > If LAG or virtual devices have similar problems then a generic solution is
> needed.
> 
> At exit, there is call to stop_packet_forwarding(). Shouldn't that stop SoftNic
> from polling of the queues ?

Hi Aman,

Unfortunately not. Calling the stop_packet_forwarding() will not stop the core running the Soft NIC, as Soft NIC is running on a service core, and the service cores are not handled by this function.

Moreover, a Soft NIC device is not taking over the entire service core; the same service core can also run other services e.g. Soft NIC for device A, telemetry, stats, Soft NIC for device B, etc). Therefore, stopping the service core associated with a Soft NIC device will also incorrectly result in stopping all the other services running on the same service core.

Stopping the service for a Soft NIC device is done by the stop() function, which is exactly what we are trying to do with this short patch.

Regards,
Cristian



More information about the dev mailing list