[dpdk-dev] [v5] doc: define qualification criteria for external library

[Hemant Agrawal]

On 08-Jan-24 2:01 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:47 PM Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08-Jan-24 1:28 PM, jerinj at marvell.com wrote:
>>> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
>>>
>>> Define qualification criteria for external library
>>> based on a techboard meeting minutes [1] and past
>>> learnings from mailing list discussion.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-June/135847.html
>>> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2024-January/284849.html
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
>>> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>
>>> +#. **Distributions License:**
>>> +
>>> +   - No specific constraints beyond documentation.
>>
>> Though we are not mandatory open distribution. However we should ask for the
>> defining the distribution aspect clearly in the library.
>
> How about following then,
>
> No specific constraints, but clear documentation on distribution usage
> aspects is required.
>
> If not, please suggest the exact wording.

I think above is ok.


>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 9818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20240108/77891f80/attachment.bin>