[dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy filter with rte_flow

[Tu, Lijuan]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang at intel.com>
> Sent: 2021年11月9日 17:23
> To: Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu at intel.com>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng at intel.com>;
> dts at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy filter with
> rte_flow
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu at intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 5:11 PM
> > To: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang at intel.com>; Peng, Yuan
> > <yuan.peng at intel.com>; dts at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang at intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy
> > filter with rte_flow
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dts <dts-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Yu Jiang
> > > Sent: 2021年11月8日 15:10
> > > To: Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng at intel.com>; dts at dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang at intel.com>
> > > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy
> > > filter with rte_flow
> > >
> > > According to dpdk commit 81db321da("ethdev: remove legacy HASH
> > > filter type support"), remove legacy hash filter to use rte_flow api replace.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yu Jiang <yux.jiang at intel.com>
> >
> > Is there any other case impact by the dpdk commit ? if yes, please fix
> > them too.
> Other two TCs will be removed from this plan and suite due to no cmd to
> support them any more.

Series applied